Carbon Sequestration in Tropical Agroforestry Systems: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends and Future Perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15649/2346075X.6080Keywords:
Agroforestry systems, Carbon sequestration, Tropical ecosystems, Ecosystem servicesAbstract
Introduction. The conversion of tropical forests to agricultural and pastoral land has reduced soil carbon stocks by 12 to 30% and removed more than 200 Mg C per hectare of aboveground biomass, which reinforces interest in agroforestry systems that can sequester carbon and restore degraded soils. Objectives: To describe and quantitatively analyse the evolution of research on carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems, identifying temporal, geographical and thematic patterns to inform mitigation policies. Materials and Methods. A systematic bibliometric review of the Scopus database was conducted using a specific search string, with no language or time restrictions; after screening and metadata cleaning, 788 documents published between 1992 and 2026 in 283 sources were analysed with Bibliometrix and VOSviewer, with 2026 records treated as early access items. Results. The results show an annual growth rate of 4.16%, a mean article age of 7.25 years, 3,121 authors with an average of 5.36 co-authors per article and 43.78% international co-authorship, 5,580 references and 2,092 author keywords, a core of nine journals that concentrate 27% of publications, recurrent institutional and national participation patterns, and thematic clusters centred on agroforestry, soil carbon, ecosystem services and land use. Conclusions. The field is now well established and offers a contextual basis for discussions on ecosystem-based mitigation, restoration of degraded tropical landscapes and low carbon rural development, although important gaps remain regarding costs, equity, gender, indigenous peoples and rural wellbeing that future research agendas need to address.
References
1. Smith CJ, Al Khourdajie A, Yang P, Folini D. Climate uncertainty impacts on optimal mitigation pathways and social cost of carbon. Environ Res Lett. 2023;18(9):094024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acedc6
2. Zhang Y, Jackson C, Krevor S. The feasibility of reaching gigatonne scale CO2 storage by mid-century. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):6913. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51226-8
3. Akimoto K, Nagashima M, Sano F, Ando T. Gaps between costs and potentials estimated by bottom-up assessments versus integrated assessment models. Energy Strateg Rev. 2024;55:101521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101521
4. Faggiani Dias D, Hanna R, Sachnik J, Xu Y, Gilbert J, Busch W, et al. Removing atmospheric CO2 through mass scaleup of crops with enhanced root systems. Environ Res Lett. 2025;20(5):054021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adc31b
5. Jiang J, Shi S, Raftery AE. Mitigation efforts to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and meet the Paris Agreement have been offset by economic growth. Commun Earth Environ. 2025;6(1):823. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02743-x
6. Weerasinghe SN, McLaren SJ, Boulic M, Dowdell D, Chandrakumar C. Dynamic carbon budgets and carbon debts for Aotearoa New Zealand and its building sector. Build Environ. 2026; 287:113805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113805
7. Batamack Nkoué B, Tchiofo Lontsi R, Chimi PM, Oum JA, Menyene Etoundi LF, Njila Nana EN, et al. Influence of elaeicultural agroecosystem types on carbon storage in a monomodal rainforest agroecological zone. Agrofor Syst. 2026;100(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-025-01360-z
8. Naval MLM, Bieluczyk W, Alvarez F, Carvalho LC da S, Maracahipes-Santos L, Oliveira EA de, et al. Impacts of repeated forest fires and agriculture on soil organic matter and health in southern Amazonia. Catena. 2025;254:108924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2025.108924
9. Saha K, Anil Kumar KS, Nair KM, Jessy MD, Ghosh S, Lalitha M, et al. Impact of rubber cultivation on soil quality and carbon stocks in Southern Peninsular India. Soil Use Manage. 2025;41(3):e70110. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.70110
10. Duque A, Gómez-Correa LF, Barona-Colmenares AA, Castaño N, Davies S, Zuleta D, et al. Local scale carbon stock measurements, including deep soil layers, in a terra firme forest in northwestern Amazon. J Trop Ecol. 2025;41:e1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467424000270
11. Kauffman JB, Souza FM, Costa RF, Barreto da Silva AE, Ferreira TO, Megonigal JP, et al. Conversion of tropical forests to water buffalo pastures in lower Amazonia: carbon losses and social carbon costs. Ecosphere. 2024;15(12):e70055. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70055
12. Bossy T, Ciais P, Renaudineau S, Wan L, Ygorra B, Adam E, et al. State of the art in remote sensing monitoring of carbon dynamics in African tropical forests. Front Remote Sens. 2025;6:1532280. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2025.1532280
13. de Almeida DRA, Vedovato LB, Fuza M, Molin P, Cassol H, Resende AF, et al. Remote sensing approaches to monitor tropical forest restoration: current methods and future possibilities. J Appl Ecol. 2025;62(2):188-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14830
14. Maurício RM, Abdalla AL, Perez S, Paciullo DSC. Could biomass revolution be achieved with silvopastoral systems? In: Chará J, Jose S, editors. Silvopastoral Systems of Meso America and Northern South America. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2024. p. 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43063-3_4
15. Kumar A, Ray T, Mohanasundari T, Jatav SS, Chatterjee U, Shekhar S, et al. Forest fires and climate change in India: impacts, adaptive strategies, and pathways for climate action (Sustainable Development Goal-13). Environ Sci Eur. 2025;37(1):147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-025-01195-6
16. Fu S, Lei J, You Y, Zhou N. Assessment of land degradation in the conventional Lake Chad Basin between 2001 and 2020 based on SDG 15.3.1. Environ Sustain Indic. 2025;28:101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.101002
17. Yadav M, Mittal R, Kumari A, Bhatia A, Khatri A, Bhateria R. Soil carbon fractions and their role in climate-resilient agriculture: a review. Sustain Chem Clim Action. 2025;7:100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scca.2025.100127
18. Miranda J, Britz W, Börner J. Impacts of commodity prices and governance on the expansion of tropical agricultural frontiers. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):9209. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59446-0
19. Morales-Ruiz DE, Aryal DR, Villanueva-López G, Casanova-Lugo F, Venegas-Venegas JA, Pinto-Ruiz R, et al. Tree structure, species composition, and carbon storage in tropical silvopastoral systems. Trop Subtrop Agroecosystems. 2025;28(1). https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.5622
20. Subramanyan J. Soil nutrient reservoir in a changing climate scenario. In: Tripathi S, Bhadouria R, Srivastava P, Singh R, Devi RS, editors. Ecophysiology of Tropical Plants: Recent Trends and Future Perspectives. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2023. p. 98-103. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003335054-12
21. Guterres L, Duarte MC, Catarino S, Roxo G, Barnabé J, Sebastiana M, et al. Diversity of legumes in the cashew agroforestry system in East Timor (Southeast Asia). Foods. 2022;11(21):3503. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11213503
22. Zeppetello LRV, Cook-Patton SC, Parsons LA, Wolff NH, Kroeger T, Battisti DS, et al. Consistent cooling benefits of silvopasture in the tropics. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):708. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28388-4
23. Akter R, Hasan MK, Roshni NA, Hemel SAK, Islam MdT. Biomass accumulation and carbon stocks of soil and tree components of different agroforestry systems in tropical moist regions of Bangladesh. Trees For People. 2025;19:100793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100793
24. Magalhães TM, Reckziegel RB, Paulino J. Soil organic carbon in tropical shade coffee agroforestry following land-use changes in Mozambique. Agrosyst Geosci Environ. 2025;8(1):e70043. https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70043
25. Amorim HCS, Cogo FD, Cunha RL, Silva CA, Ashworth AJ, Zinn YL. Soil structure and organic carbon dynamics from agroforestry and conventional coffee systems in a clayey Oxisol. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2026;397:110042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.110042
26. Franco JN, Sainz Meyer H, Babe Ó, Martins M, Reis B, Sanchez-Gallego Á, et al. Potential blue carbon in the fringe of Southern European kelp forests. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):29573. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09361-9
27. Mazumder SY, Bania JK, Sileshi GW, Paul MK, Das AK, Nath AJ. Variation in biomass and soil carbon storage and sequestration rates in different agroforestry systems with climatic zones and soil types. Environ Sustain Indic. 2025;26:100642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100642
28. Sterling A, Suárez-Córdoba YD, Orlandi F del B, Rodríguez-León CH. Soil–atmosphere GHG fluxes in cacao agroecosystems on São Tomé Island, Central Africa: toward climate-smart practices. Land. 2025;14(9):1918. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091918
29. Pan J, Chen S, He D, Zhou H, Ning K, Ma N, et al. Agroforestry increases soil carbon sequestration, especially in arid areas: a global meta-analysis. Catena. 2025;249:108667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.108667
30. Eckhardt KI, Maia AG, Noriega-Puglisevich JA, Jara WC. Agroforestry and montane forest management as strategies to mitigate carbon loss and sustain ecosystem functions in the Central Andes of Peru. Scientia Agropecu. 2026;17(1):77-89. https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2026.005
31. Piponiot C, Cogné M, Freycon V, Thoumazeau A, Gusmão M, Peltier R. Traditional agroforestry systems in Timor-Leste can store large amounts of carbon in both soil and biomass. Agrofor Syst. 2025;99(6):138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-025-01222-8
32. Tom A, Divya Vijayan V, Kunhamu TK, Sandeep S, Surendra Gopal K, Jamaludheen V, et al. Plant diversity and microbial interaction on soil carbon stock in the tropical homegardens: a nature-based solution to climate change. Agrofor Syst. 2025;99(2):29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-025-01135-6
33. Molina-Alvarado D, Aryal DR, Venegas-Venegas JA, Casanova-Lugo F, Guevara-Hernández F, Pinto-Ruíz R, et al. Soil organic carbon storage in coffee agroforestry systems: a review. Terra Latinoam. 2025;43. https://doi.org/10.28940/terralatinoamericana.v43i.2195
34. Kirchengast G, Pichler M. A traceable global warming record and clarity for the 1.5 °C and well-below-2 °C goals. Commun Earth Environ. 2025;6(1):402. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02368-0
35. Liu L, Chen L, Yin Z, Jiang F, Lei L, Cheng T, et al. Review and perspective of remote sensing research on global greenhouse gas monitoring and stocktaking. Chin Sci Bull. 2025;70(24):4134-55. https://doi.org/10.1360/TB-2024-1033
36. Sharma U, Sharma S, Sankhyan N, Sharma S, Sharma S. A global review of agroforestry research and policy directions: addressing ecological and socioeconomic challenges through systematic review and bibliometric analysis. For Policy Econ. 2025;181:103639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103639
37. Hoyos-Alayo WM. Bibliometric analysis of energy poverty and thermal comfort in the residential sector and social housing. Rev Bras Meio Ambient. 2026;14(2):2-28. https://doi.org/10.66205/rvbma.v14i2.2056
38. Hoyos-Alayo WM. Bibliometric analysis of urbanisation, land-use change and ecosystem services in urban and regional planning. Rev Bras Meio Ambient. 2026;14(1):209-36. https://doi.org/10.66205/rvbma.v14i1.20655
39. Luna-Morales ME, Pérez-Angón MÁ, Luna-Morales E. Strengthen of a scientific field in Latin America: evolutionary computation. J Scientometr Res. 2023;12(2):264-74. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.2.025
40. Bellido-Valdiviezo O, Cardoza-Sernaqué MA, Cardoza-Sernaqué LS, Gamarra-Mendoza S, Estrada-Espinoza JA, Torres-Solano CG, et al. Digital citizenship: a bibliographic review of the publications in Scopus from 2017 to 2022. In: Proceedings of the LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology; 2023. Paper 975.
41. García LKO, Alayo WMH, Taboada SLV, Benites NIP. Bibliometric analysis on bridging the digital divide among university students: trends and prospects. Rev Conhecimento Online. 2025;1:193-220. https://doi.org/10.25112/rco.v1.3963
42. Leiva Piedra JL, Hoyos Alayo WM, Chávez Romero ZB, Fernández Miranda M. Environmental research from a European and Latin American perspective: a literature review. LACCEI. 2024;2(11). https://doi.org/10.18687/LEIRD2024.1.1.253
43. Hoyos Alayo WM. Bioadsorption of arsenic by fruit residues: a systematic review. LACCEI. 2025;1(12). https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2025.1.1.589
44. Hoyos-Alayo WM. Frugal innovation in industrial water treatment processes in emerging economies (2015–2025): a systematic review. LACCEI. 2025;2(13). https://doi.org/10.18687/LEIRD2025.1.1.140
45. Osemwegie OO, Olaniran AF, Folorunsho JO, Nwonuma CO, Ojo OA, Adetunde LA, et al. Preliminary bibliometrics of plant-derived health foods over the last decade in the Scopus database. Afr J Food Agric Nutr Dev. 2023;23(8):24363-82. https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.123.22765
46. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix: Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Jun 8]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/bibliometrix/index.html
47. Sulphey MM, AlKahtani NS, Senan NAM, Adow AHE. A bibliometric study on organization citizenship behavior for the environment. Glob J Environ Sci Manag. 2024;10(2):891-906. https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2024.02.29
48. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. VOSviewer: visualizing scientific landscapes [Internet]. Leiden: Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS); 2024 [cited 2024 Jun 8]. Available from: https://www.vosviewer.com/
49. Apdini T, van Middelaar CE, Oosting SJ. Developing sustainable dairy farms in the tropics: from policy to practice. Agric Syst. 2024;220:104097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104097
50. Pradhan C, Ghosh AK, Singh P, Gadhwal R. Agroforestry systems: an effective tool for carbon sequestration. In: Chakravarty S, Vineeta, Bhat JA, Kumar M, Shukla G, editors. Sustainable Management and Conservation of Environmental Resources in India. Apple Academic Press; 2024. p. 181-206. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003469278-8.
51. Kumar BM. Do carbon stocks and floristic diversity of tropical homegardens vary along an elevational gradient and based on holding size in central Kerala, India? Agrofor Syst. 2023;97(5):751-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00821-7
52. Kurmi B, Nath AJ, Sileshi GW, Pandey R, Das AK. Land use change affects net ecosystem production in the Eastern Indian Himalayan region. Environ Sustain Indic. 2025;26:100670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100670
53. Filip ID, Peri PL, Fernández P, Loto D, Kees SM, Banegas N, et al. Modelling woody carbon dynamics in tropical dry forests: a case study of the Dry Chaco Region. Ecol Model. 2026;512:111401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111401
54. Solarte-Soto JA, Ospina-Bautista F, Fremout T, Melo-Zipacon WF, Valencia-Molina MC, Pulleman M. Biodiversity and ecosystem services of cacao agroforestry arrangements in the Colombian Amazon. Agrofor Syst. 2025;99(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-025-01326-1
55. Roberts SC, Montagnini F, Lynch RL, Toth J, Queenborough SA. Incorporating drone imagery and field data to assess geographic and social drivers of agroforestry biodiversity in western Ecuador. Environ Dev. 2026;57:101344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101344
56. Suárez JC, Almario-Cabrera E, Lavelle P. Cocoa-based agroforestry systems enhance carbon storage in deep horizons of Amazonian soils. Agrofor Syst. 2025;99(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-025-01317-2
57. Doe EK, Attua EM, Obour PB, Amon-Armah F, Mensah M, Adjei-Boadi D, et al. Assessing gender and geospatial factors impacting cocoa productivity in Ghana’s organic and conventional agroforestry systems. West Afr J Appl Ecol. 2025;33(1):66-84.
58. Oliveira Fiorini AC, Rua Rodriguez Rochedo P, Angelkorte G, Diuana FA, Império M, Silva Carvalho L, et al. Investigating biodiversity trends in different mitigation scenarios with a national integrated assessment model. J Integr Environ Sci. 2023;20(1):2239323. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2023.2239323
59. Pilon LC, Ambus JV, Blume E, Seminoti Jacques RJ, Reichert JM. Integrated analysis of agroecosystems with citrus orchards in organic, agroforestry, and conventional systems. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst. 2026;50(1):46-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2025.2483789
60. Sánchez-Romero R, Balvanera P, García-Barrios LE, Mora F, Larsen J, Maass M, et al. Impacts of silvopastoral management intensity and forest age on vegetation and soils of dry tropical forests. Agrofor Syst. 2025;99(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-025-01334-1
61. Oliveira MS, Patrício JDS, de Menezes JA, Frozzi JC, de Souza Feitoza S, de Souza MS, et al. Temporal variability of attributes and soil CO2 efflux in coffee and açaí cultivation areas in the Southwest Amazon Region, Brazil. Rev Bras Geogr Fis. 2024;17(4):2243-59. https://doi.org/10.26848/rbgf.v17.4.p2243-2259
62. Parra-Paitan C, Meyfroidt P, Verburg PH, zu Ermgassen EKHJ. Deforestation and climate risk hotspots in the global cocoa value chain. Environ Sci Policy. 2024;158:103796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103796
63. Starinchak BH, Griscom H. Pastures as natural climate solutions: a socioecological study of tree carbon and beef production trade-offs. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2024;373:109112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2024.109112
64. Bieluczyk W, Cherubin MR, Cerri CEP, Siqueira-Neto M, Abdalla-Filho AL, Castro JIA, et al. Greenhouse gas fluxes in Brazilian climate-smart agricultural and livestock systems: a systematic and critical overview. J Clean Prod. 2024;464:142782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142782
65. Teo HC, Lamba A, Ng SJW, Nguyen AT, Dwiputra A, Lim AJY, et al. Reduction of deforestation by agroforestry in high carbon stock forests of Southeast Asia. Nat Sustain. 2025;8(4):358-62. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01532-w
66. Díaz-Cháux JT, Velasquez-Valencia A, Casanoves F. Influence of landscape structure on carbon storage in agroforestry systems with cacao and silvopastoral systems in the Colombian Amazon. PLoS One. 2025;20(6):e0325477. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325477
67. Kodithuwakku AN, Karalliyadda SMCB, Lankapura AIY, Navodya HAH, Jayakody JDTD, Premarathne NMKC. Agroforestry for sustainable livelihoods and rural development. In: Atapattu AJ, editor. Agroforestry for a Climate-Smart Future. IGI Global; 2025. p. 73-108. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8282-0.ch003
68. Lodh UK, Chauhan V, Verma S, Chand K. Plantation forestry. In: Kumar Mandal A, Nicodemus A, editors. Textbook of Forest Science. Singapore: Springer; 2025. p. 495-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8289-5_22
69. Suwethaasri D, Baranidharan K, Ravi R, Tilak M, Kalpana M, Ragunath KP, et al. Assessing the impact of climate change on forest biomass and carbon sequestration in India: a systematic review. Plant Sci Today. 2025;12(3). https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8115
70. Adinugroho WC, Tata HL, Darwo, Lisnawati Y, Nuroniah HS, Dewi R, et al. Land use changes, greenhouse gas emissions, and rehabilitation model of native tree species towards sustainable management. Glob J Environ Sci Manag. 2024;10(4):1735-58. https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2024.04.15
71. Pramulya R, Dahlan D, Asy’Ari R, Gustawan AH, Dzulfigar A, Novita E, et al. Assessment of Gayo agroforestry coffee characteristics and carbon stock potential in Mumuger social forestry area, Central Aceh Regency. Trees For People. 2025;20:100818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100818
72. 3rd Biennial Conference of Tropical Biodiversity. In: IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. Bristol: IOP Publishing; 2023.
73. Demie G, Negash M, Asrat Z, Bohdan L. Carbon stocks vary in reference to the models used, socioecological factors and agroforestry practices in Central Ethiopia. Agrofor Syst. 2024;98(6):1905-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-024-00998-5
74. Calderón-Balcázar A, Cárdenas CD, Díaz-Vasco O, Fandiño E, Márquez T, Pizano C. Biomass and carbon stocks of four vegetation types in the Llanos Orientales of Colombia (Mapiripán, Meta). Trees For People. 2023;12:100380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2023.100380
75. Teramage MT, Bassango B, Sime G. Litterfall-associated carbon deposition and vertical profiles of soil organic carbon in different land-use systems. Appl Environ Soil Sci. 2024;2024:3350038. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3350038
76. Qasha V, Manyevere A, Flynn T, Mashamaite CV. Assessing the impact of ecological forest restoration on soil carbon stocks in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Carbon Manag. 2024;15(1):2404409. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2024.2404409
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Innovaciencia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in this scientific journal are protected by copyright. The authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits sharing the work with authorship recognition and without commercial purposes.
Readers may copy and distribute the material from this journal issue for non-commercial purposes in any medium, provided the original work is cited and credit is given to the authors and the journal.
Any commercial use of the material from this journal is strictly prohibited without written permission from the copyright holder.
For more information on the copyright of the journal and open access policies, please visit our website.
