Rev Cuid. 2025; 16(2): 4593

https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.4593

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Confirmatory factor analysis of the internet addiction test in university students

Análisis factorial confirmatorio del test de adicción a internet en estudiantes universitarios

Análise fatorial confirmatória do teste de dependência à internet em estudantes universitários

Professor at the Federal University of Ceará, UFC. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. E-mail: manumfc2003@yahoo.com.br Correspondence Author Manuela de Mendonça Figueirêdo Coelho
Professor at the Federal University of Ceará, UFC. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. E-mail: manumfc2003@yahoo.com.br Viviane Mamede Vasconcelos Cavalcante
Federal University of Ceará, UFC. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. E-mail: tifannyhortacastro@gmail.com Tifanny Horta Castro
Professor at the Federal University of Ceará, UFC. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. E-mail: monica.oria@ufc.br Mônica Oliveira Batista Oriá
Professor at the Federal University of Ceará, UFC. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. E-mail: eve_pinheiro@yahoo.com.br Eveline Pinheiro Beserra
Professor at the Federal University of Ceará, UFC. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. E-mail: fabianegubert@hotmail.com Fabiane do Amaral Gubert
Professor at the Federal University of Ceará, UFC. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. E-mail: marianaenfermagem@hotmail.com Mariana Cavalcante Martins
Professor at the Federal University of Ceará, UFC. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. E-mail: mariliabm1@yahoo.com.br Marília Braga Marques
Professor at the Federal University of Ceará, UFC. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. E-mail: sachanogueiraufc@gmail.com Paula Sacha Frota Nogueira
Professor at the Federal University of Ceará, UFC. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. E-mail: janaina.victor@gmail.com Janaína Fonseca Victor Coutinho
Professor at the Federal University of Ceará, UFC. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. E-mail: rachelgabrielb@hotmail.com Rachel Gabriel Bastos Barbosa

Highlights


 

How to cite this article: Coelho, Manuela de Mendonça Figueirêdo; Cavalcante, Viviane Mamede Vasconcelos; Castro, Tiffany Horta; Oriá, Mônica Oliveira Batista; Beserra, Eveline Pinheiro; Gubert, Fabiane do Amaral; Martins, Mariana Cavalcante; Marques, Marília Braga; Nogueira, Paula Sacha Frota; Coutinho, Janaína Fonseca Victor; Barbosa, Rachel Gabriel Bastos. Confirmatory factor analysis of the internet addiction test in university students. Revista Cuidarte. 2025;16(2):e4593. https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.4593

Received: October 30th 2024
Accepted:
March 8th 2025
Published:
August 22th 2025

CreativeCommons 

E-ISSN: 2346-3414


Abstract

Introduction: The Internet Addiction Test is a psychometric instrument designed to assess and quantify the severity of internet addiction and explore aspects of internet misuse. Objective: To confirm the factorial validity of the Internet Addiction Test in a sample of university students. Materials and Methods: A methodological study was conducted with 5,292 Brazilian university students. The data underwent confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency assessment. Results: The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test yielded a value of 0.946, indicating that the sample was adequate. Factor analysis confirmed the existence of factors that fully align with the original American scale. The model showed satisfactory fit indices, including a Comparative Fit Index of 0.978, Tucker-Lewis Index of 0.976, Standardized Root Mean Residual of 0.053, and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation of 0.054 [0.052–0.056], which are consistent with previously established satisfactory fit criteria. Factor loadings of the items were considered high, ranging from 0.43 (item I7) to 0.89 (item I17). Discussion: The Internet Addiction Test’s six-factor structure was validated, which is identical to that proposed by the original American version and was consistent with other studies that have also identified the same multifactorial structure of the original instrument. Therefore, psychiatric nurses can confidently use it when caring for young university students. Conclusion: The Internet Addiction Test is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring internet addiction among university students and can be used by mental health nurses to identify such issues.

Keywords: Factor Analysis; Internet Addiction; Students; Psychiatric Nursing; Mental Health.


Resumen

Introducción: El Internet Addiction Test es un instrumento psicométrico diseñado para evaluar y cuantificar la gravedad de la adicción a Internet y explorar aspectos de su uso problemático. Objetivo: Confirmar la validez factorial del Internet Addiction Test en una muestra de estudiantes universitarios. Materiales y Métodos: Se realizó un estudio metodológico con 5.292 estudiantes universitarios brasileños. Los datos fueron sometidos a un análisis factorial confirmatorio y de consistencia interna. Resultados: Los resultados del test de Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin arrojó un valor de 0,946, lo cual indica que la muestra era adecuada. El análisis factorial confirmó la existencia de factores que se alineaban completamente con la escala estadounidense original. El modelo mostró índices de ajuste satisfactorios, incluyendo un índice de ajuste comparativo de 0,978, índice de Tucker-Lewis de 0,976, residuo cuadrático medio estandarizado de 0,053 y error cuadrático medio de aproximación de 0,054 [0,052-0,056], los cuales son consistentes con los criterios de ajuste satisfactorio establecidos previamente. Las cargas factoriales de los ítems se consideraron altas y oscilaron entre 0,43 (ítem I7) y 0,89 (ítem I17). Discusión: La estructura de seis factores del Internet Addiction Test fue validada y resultó idéntica a la propuesta por la versión estadounidense original y es consistente con otros estudios que también han identificado la misma estructura multifactorial del instrumento original. Por lo tanto, las enfermeras psiquiátricas pueden utilizarlo con confianza al atender a jóvenes universitarios. Conclusión: El Internet Addiction Test es un instrumento válido y confiable para medir la adicción a Internet en estudiantes universitarios y puede ser utilizado por enfermeras de salud mental para identificar dichos problemas.

Palabras Clave: Análisis Factorial; Adicción a Internet; Estudiantes; Enfermería Psiquiátrica; Salud Mental.


Resumo

Introdução: O Internet Addiction Test é um instrumento psicométrico desenvolvido para avaliar e quantificar a gravidade da dependência de Internet e explorar aspectos do uso indevido da Internet. Objetivo: Confirmar a validade fatorial do Internet Addiction Test em uma amostra de estudantes universitários. Materiais e Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo metodológico com 5.292 estudantes universitários brasileiros, submetidos à análise fatorial confirmatória. Resultados: Os resultados do teste Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (0,946) indicaram que a amostra era adequada. A análise fatorial confirmou a existência de fatores que não se alinhavam totalmente com a escala americana original. O modelo apresentou índices de ajuste satisfatórios, incluindo um Índice de Ajuste Comparativo de 0,978, Índice de Tucker-Lewis de 0,976, Raiz Média Residual Padronizada de 0,053 e Raiz Média Quadrática de Erro de Aproximação de 0,054 [0,052–0,056], que são consistentes com os critérios de ajuste satisfatórios previamente estabelecidos. As cargas fatoriais dos itens foram consideradas altas, variando de 0,43 (item I7) a 0,89 (item I17). Discussão: O modelo teórico do Internet Addiction Test foi validado em termos da composição de seis fatores, que é idêntico ao proposto pela versão americana original e é consistente com outros estudos que também identificaram a mesma estrutura multifatorial do instrumento original. Portanto, enfermeiros psiquiátricos podem usá-lo com confiança ao cuidar de jovens estudantes universitários. Conclusão: O Internet Addiction Test foi considerado um instrumento válido e confiável para medir o vício em Internet em estudantes universitários e pode ser utilizado por enfermeiros de saúde mental para identificar tais problemas.

Palavras-Chave: Análise Fatorial; Vício em Internet; Estudantes; Enfermagem Psiquiátrica; Saúde Mental.


 

Introduction

University students' mental health cannot be overlooked any longer. It is imperative that anxiety, sleep disturbances, substance abuse, and other mental disorders be considered and included in discussions of public education and health policies1-4.

Internet overuse has been associated with adverse effects on individuals' health and well-being. For example, it is reasonable to infer that teenagers may exhibit high levels of stress, anxiety, and depression proportional to their levels of internet addiction5. Another significant consequence of pervasive internet use is the tendency among university students to procrastinate academic activities6. Many students struggle to exercise self-control regarding the use of this technology7.

The Internet Addiction Test (IAT) is a psychometric instrument designed to assess and quantify the severity of internet addiction. It is a self-administered, publicly available instrument used to estimate an individual's level of internet addiction8. Although a Portuguese version was translated and validated in 20129, this scale is not widely used in Brazil.

The IAT consists of 20 items grouped into six factors: salience, excessive use, neglect of work, anticipation, lack of control, and neglect of social life. The results are interpreted across three levels of usage: mild, moderate, and severe, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 points9,10.

The salience factor refers to the persistent preoccupation with being connected to the internet. Excessive use is defined as a loss of time perception or the neglect of basic needs resulting from internet use. Neglect of work and social activities occurs when individuals cease to engage in these activities to remain online. Anticipation is defined as the act of using the internet even before addressing any other important needs. The concept of lack refers to the user's inability to regulate the amount of time spent online8.

The internal consistency of the IAT has been evaluated in several studies conducted worldwide. In the United Kingdom, factor analysis confirmed its internal consistency and corroborated the six-factor structure. Consistency coefficients ranged from 0.54 to 0.82 across domains, with positive correlation among them11. Two additional studies, conducted in Italy and Switzerland, also identified the presence of six factors, with one factor having a prominent influence on the scale's overall variance12,13.

In Brazil, the initial internal consistency analysis of the instrument demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency for most items (items 01 and 07 exhibited suboptimal results). Moreover, the six-factor structure was also confirmed; however, the grouping of items only partially aligned with the original scale's distribution10. Given the limited sample size used in this study, further evaluations of the factor structure were recommended. In 2021, a new psychometric evaluation of the scale was conducted in Brazil, identifying the presence of only three factors14.

Nurses working in mental health should pay attention to this type of addiction that has been developing among young people, and conduct assessments for signs and symptoms of internet addiction, bearing in mind that it can have a negative impact on individuals' lives, especially since it has been associated with high levels of depression and negative body image15,16. Thus, with a reliable instrument, nurses will be able to objectively assess such behaviors and design nursing interventions in collaboration with the multidisciplinary team to minimize or mitigate this condition.

In light of the above, it is imperative to present how the factor structure of the IAT manifests in this specific sample to contribute evidence regarding the consistency of the instrument and assess whether it maintains its original factorial structure. This is particularly important given that the IAT has already undergone factor analysis and is used to measure the degree of internet dependency.

Considering the discrepancies found in previous studies, particularly those conducted in Brazil, it is imperative to conduct a confirmatory factor analysis of the IAT. The objective of this study is to confirm the factorial validity of the IAT in a sample of Brazilian university students.

 

Materials and Methods

The study employed a cross-sectional design with a quantitative approach. The study sample consisted of Brazilian university students enrolled in public (federal and state) and private higher education institutions. The inclusion criteria required participants to be over 18 years and to have completed at least the first semester of their undergraduate or graduate program. Incomplete forms were excluded from the analysis.

For sample size calculation, the census from the Brazilian Ministry of Education was considered, which indicates that approximately two million people are enrolled in universities in Brazil. Thus, the research sample was calculated considering a 95% confidence level and a 3% margin of error, resulting in a minimum required sample size of 3,198 participants. However, the objective was to collect as much data as possible to increase the generalizability of the results. Consequently, of the 5,345 responses received, only 5,292 were included in the final sample. The STROBE guidelines, as recommended by the EQUATOR Network for observational studies, were followed. Data from this survey are available on the OSFHome platform17.

To collect data, an online questionnaire was employed, which included items on sociodemographic and academic characteristics, health conditions, and the Internet Addiction Test (IAT), composed of 20 Likert-scale items. These items are distributed across six factors: salience (items 10, 12, 13, 15, 19), excessive use (items 1, 2, 14, 18, 20), neglect of work (items 6, 8, 9), anticipation (items 7, 11), lack of control (items 5, 16, 17), and neglect of social life (items 3, 4).

Data collection took place online between November 2021 and March 2022. An initial survey of all public (federal and state) and private universities listed on the Brazilian Ministry of Education website was conducted. Subsequently, institutional websites were searched, and a survey of the courses offered by all universities with websites was conducted. The email addresses of the coordinators of all courses were also collected.

Subsequently, an invitation email was sent to these course coordinators, explaining the objective of the research and requesting that the invitation be forwarded to all enrolled students. This allowed students to decide freely whether to participate. The email also included the informed consent form, which could be digitally signed by those who wished to participate, as well as the data collection instruments.

The psychometric sensitivity of the IAT items was estimated using descriptive statistics, including central tendency, dispersion, kurtosis, and skewness. Items with skewness values below three and kurtosis values below seven were considered to have adequate sensitivity18.

The internal consistency of each factor was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α), with α values of 0.70 or higher deemed appropriate. Sample adequacy was tested using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) index and Bartlett's test of sphericity. A KMO index > 0.5 and Bartlett's test of sphericity with p-value < 0.005 were considered adequate.

To evaluate inter-factor correlations, the Spearman correlation test was employed, with the following interpretation: Correlation coefficients ranging from 0.8 to 1.0 indicate a strong correlation, while coefficients between 0.5 and 0.8 indicate a moderate correlation. Coefficients of 0.2 to 0.5 indicate a weak correlation, while coefficients of 0.0 to 0.2 indicate negligible correlation.

A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess the plausibility of the IAT's multidimensional structure. The analysis was conducted using the robust diagonally weighted least squares (RDWLS) estimation method19,20.

Model fit was evaluated using the following indices: χ2, χ2/df, Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), Standardized Root Mean Residual (SRMR), and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA). It is important to note that non-significant χ2 values are preferred. Furthermore, a χ2/df ratio should be less than 5, or preferably less than 3. Additionally, the Comparative Fit Index (CFI) and the Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) values should be greater than 0.90, with a preference for values above 0.95. Finally, the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) should be less than 0.08, or preferably less than 0.06, with a confidence interval (upper limit) less than 0.1021. Adequate factor loadings above 0.40 will be considered22.

The results were organized in an Excel spreadsheet and exported to the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 23.0, for descriptive, inferential, and correlational analyses. JASP software was employed for the factor analyses.

This study followed all the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Its content and execution were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Ceará. All participants signed the informed consent form agreeing to participate in the study. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee under opinion number 4.277.440.

 

Results

The sample included 5,292 university students from Brazil, with an average age of 24 (SD ± 6.9). Table 1 shows the students' sociodemographic, academic, and health-related data.

 

Table 1. Sociodemographic, academic, behavioral, and health characteristics

 

The correlations among the IAT factors are shown in Table 2.

 

Table 2. Correlation coefficients between the factors of the Internet Addiction Test

X

Table 2. Correlation coefficients between the factors of the Internet Addiction Test

Factor 1

Salience

Factor 2

Excessive use

Factor 3

Neglect of work

Factor 4

Anticipation

Factor 5

Lack of control

Factor 6

Neglect of social life

Factor 1 Salience 1 0.747* 0.534* 0.698* 0.666* 0.506*
Factor 2 Excessive use - 1 0.569* 0.697* 0.778* 0.467*
Factor 3 Neglect of work - - 1 0.595* 0.519* 0.379*
Factor 4 Anticipation - - - 1 0.654* 0.418*
Factor 5 Lack of control - - - - 1 0.411*

Spearman's rho coefficients. *p< 0.001

 

A significant correlation was observed between salience and excessive use (rho=0.747), as well as between excessive use and a lack of control (rho=0.778). These values approach the threshold for a strong correlation.

Psychometric sensitivity of the IAT items is reported in Table 3 through descriptive statistics. The flattening (kurtosis) values were not statistically significant, with small variations from 1.546 to 1.479.

The Cronbach's α for the salience factor was α=0.779, for excessive use was α=0.771, for neglect of work was α=0.497, for anticipation was α=0.563, for lack of control was α=0.718, and for neglect of social life was α=0.291. The internal consistency of the IAT was deemed adequate (α=0.916), with a KMO index of 0.946 and a Bartlett's test of sphericity (p< 0.001), indicating that the data were suitable for factor analysis.

A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to assess the plausibility of the IAT's multidimensional structure. The model demonstrated good fit, with a χ2 value of 2766.580 (df = 170, p < 0.001). The χ2/df ratio for degrees of freedom was high (16.27), with CFI=0.978, TLI=0.976, SRMR= 0.053, and RMSEA= 0.054 [0.0052-0.0056]. These results meet the commonly accepted criteria for good model fit. The factor loadings of the items were high, ranging from 0.43 (item I 7) to 0.89 (item I 17) (Figure 1).

 

Table 3. Distribution measures for items of the Internet Addiction Test among Brazilian university students (n=5292)

X

Table 3. Distribution measures for items of the Internet Addiction Test among Brazilian university students (n=5292)

Item Average Standard deviation
1) How often do you find that you stay online longer than you intended? 3.89 ±1.25
2) How often do you neglect household chores to spend more time online? 2.89 ±1.58
3) How often do you prefer the excitement of the Internet to intimacy/relationships with your partner/friends? 1.31 ±1.64
4) How often do you form new relationships with fellow online users? 1.78 ±1.67
5) How often do others in your life complain to you about the amount of time you spend online? 1.83 ±1.72
6) How often do your grades or school work suffer because of the amount of time you spend online? 1.57 ±1.72
7) How often do you check your email before something else that you need to do? 2.04 ±1.79
8) How often does your job performance or productivity suffer because of the Internet? 1.82 ±1.74
9) How often do you become defensive or secretive when anyone asks you what you do online? 1.22 ±1.64
10) How often do you block out disturbing thoughts about your life with soothing thoughts of the Internet? 2.16 ±1,93
11) How often do you find yourself anticipating when you will go online again? 1.64 ±1.75
12) How often do you feel that life without the Internet would be boring, empty, and joyless? 1.90 ±1.84
13) How often do you snap, yell, or act annoyed if someone bothers you while you are online? 0.96 ±1.46
14) How often do you lose sleep due to late-night logins? 2.05 ±1.84
15) How often do you feel preoccupied with the Internet when offline, or fantasize about being online? 1.36 ±1.65
16) How often do you find yourself saying “just a few more minutes” when online? 2.46 ±1.84
17) How often do you try to cut down the amount of time you spend online and fail? 2.29 ±1.79
18) How often do you try to hide how long you have been online? 1.18 ±1.67
19) How often do you choose to spend more time online over going out with others? 1.80 ±1.84
20) How often do you feel depressed, moody, or nervous when you are offline, which goes away once you are back online? 1.30 ±1.65

 

Figure 1. Confirmatory factor analysis for the Internet Addiction Test adjusted for a sample of Brazilian university students (n=5262)

 

Discussion

The results of the present study confirm that, within the analyzed sample, the theoretical model of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT), regarding its six-factor structure, is identical to the original American version8 and aligns with other studies that have also identified the same multifactorial structure as the original instrument10,12,13. The KMO test and Bartlett's test of sphericity indicated that the sample size was appropriate for factor analysis, with values above 0.50. Therefore, psychiatric nurses can confidently use it when caring for young university students.

A growing body of research is now focusing on the high rates of internet dependency observed in contemporary society23,24. The phenomenon of internet addiction among young people has been linked to adverse effects on mental health and the reinforcement of socially isolating behaviors25. Several problems have been associated with internet addiction among university students, including negative body image, alexithymia, reduced physical activity, communication difficulties, depression, and the use of psychoactive substances26,27.

Nurses are already beginning to work to detect this problem. A study conducted by pediatric nurses in Turkey found that 89.4% of high school students participating in their study were dependent on smartphones and the internet28. In another study, nurses demonstrated that there is a negative correlation between internet addiction and students' emotional intelligence29.

Considering these findings, the use of valid and reliable instruments to measure internet addiction is of the utmost importance. Such instruments must be capable of accurately assessing the construct, thereby enabling the monitoring of internet addiction. This, in turn, enables health and education professionals, as well as family members, to implement prevention, control, and even treatment measures when necessary.

In this study, the internal consistency coefficients for the neglect of work factor (α=0.497), anticipation factor (α=0.563), and neglect of social life factor (α=0.291) were below the acceptable threshold. A psychometric study of the IAT conducted in Minas Gerais14 proposed readapt the items of the three aforementioned factors. In that study, items originally grouped under neglect of work, neglect of social life, and anticipation factors were reassigned to different factors. It is also important to consider that the low internal consistency observed may be related to the reduced number of items that comprise these factors.

Despite this, the present study identified an adequate factorial solution, satisfactory model fit, and acceptable psychometric sensitivity. All IAT items exhibited adequate levels of kurtosis and skewness, indicating that the score distribution approximated normality and that the instrument is capable of adequately discriminating between different evaluation levels.

Nevertheless, other studies have identified alternative factorial structures. A study conducted with medical students in Lebanon revealed a four-factor structure, which indicated the presence of lack of control, social withdrawal, emotional conflict, time management issues, and behavior concealment30. The psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the IAT identified only two factors as necessary for the scale31. Similarly, an Indian study also confirmed the good internal consistency of the test based on a two-factor structure32. Despite the observed divergence in factor structures, appropriate factor loadings were observed in all items, with values exceeding 0.4014,31,33.

It is important to note that different factorial structures between the IAT items in different scenarios, populations, and cultural contexts highlight the importance of validating the IAT for diverse audiences. This underscores the importance of maintaining rigor in adapting the instrument in relation to the content, cultural reality, and heterogeneity of the samples studied.

Although internet addiction is not yet included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), it is classified as a mental disorder in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Internet addiction is listed under the code 6C51, which refers to excessive use of digital devices, particularly involving online gaming34. Although there have been few studies conducted in Brazil using the IAT to identify the level of internet addiction35, it is imperative to draw attention to this condition.

It has been previously demonstrated that such dependence can be associated with suicidal ideation, unhealthy eating behaviors, and abnormal body weight, as well as impulsivity and aggression15,36,37. These findings suggest that such dependence may represent a significant yet largely overlooked public health concern.

The present study, which confirms the factorial validity of the IAT among university students, demonstrates that this instrument is a reliable and relevant tool for assessing internet addiction. Therefore, it should be incorporated into psychiatric nurses' care practices.

With this in mind, attention is also drawn to the low number of psychiatric nursing studies in this area. Considering that the internet is an active part of students' lives, and thinking that this type of dependence may be associated with other disorders (stress and anxiety) as well as personal and academic dysfunction, it is urgent that psychiatric nurses are prepared to screen for this condition and implement early interventions5,6.

Thus, the greatest contribution of this study, in addition to confirming the structural validity of the IAT to measure this construct among university students, lies in rising awareness within psychiatric nursing about the problem so that we can incorporate the use of this instrument in our practice; however, how to foster interest and emphasize the importance of nursing care in addressing this addiction remains uncertain. The need for further studies in this area is also noted.

Finally, psychiatric nurses from all countries are encouraged to pursue cross-cultural psychometric validation of this instrument so that it can be widely used in psychiatric nursing worldwide, ensuring its linguistic and psychometric applicability.

Strengths and limitations

This study validates the IAT as an effective tool for assessing internet addiction levels among Brazilian university students, a crucial aspect in understanding the impact of internet use on mental health. The significance of this article for mental health nursing lies in the potential application of the IAT as a diagnostic and preventive tool. This allows nursing professionals to identify, intervene, and provide support to individuals with excessive internet use behaviors, thereby helping to minimize associated risks such as anxiety, depression, and other mental health disorders.

One limitation of the study is the absence of concurrent criterion validation. This step would have involved correlating the IAT with another instrument measuring the same construct and latent dimensions.

 

Conclusion

The confirmatory analysis of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) to assess levels of internet addiction among university students revealed that the Brazilian version of the instrument maintains a six-factor structure consistent with the original version, showed appropriate internal consistency, and can be used by psychiatric nurses or other professionals as a screening tool for internet addiction among university students. Consequently, it can be concluded that this instrument exhibits internal consistency and structural validity, making it suitable for assessing internet addiction in this context. It is recommended that researchers consider prior research and any new evidence when designing and conducting new studies involving the IAT. Psychiatric nursing, in particular, is encouraged to design and conduct research on this topic, including the transcultural and psychometric validation of the IAT worldwide.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Financing: This research was funded by the Federal University of Ceará (scientific initiation scholarship).

 

References

X

Referencias

Martins MC, Coelho M de MF, Oliveira DT de, Almeida PC de, Cavalcante VMV, Lima LR de F, et al. Anxiety among undergraduate Nursing students with mandatory curricular internship during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rev Rene. 2022;23:e81055. https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20222381055

X

Referencias

Ruiz JPG, Muñoz FC, Buenaño MAF, Hernández ALG, Cortés JJL, Mondragón JLQ, et al. Relationship between psychoactive substance, alcohol and cigarette use in nursing students. A cross-sectional study. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2024;53(1):73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcpeng.2021.11.006

X

Referencias

Graça JMB, Silva Filho JA, Costa TS, Camboim FEF, Rivera GA, Oliveira SX. Anxiety, sleep quality and daytime sleepiness in nursing students at a private institution. Rev Ciênc Plural. 2024;10(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.21680/2446-7286.2024v10n1ID34483

X

Referencias

Mendola M, Masi F, Castiglione R, Soriano A, Zazou S, Tonelli F, et al. Mental disorders among healthcare students attending a large university hospital in Milan, Italy. Med Lav. 2024;115(2):e2024009. https://doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v115i2.15168

X

Referencias

Nadarajan S, Hengudomsub P, Wacharasin C. The role of academic procrastination on Internet addiction among Thai university students: A cross-sectional study. Belitung Nursing Journal. 2023;9(4):384–90. https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.2755

X

Referencias

Ismail A. The relationship between internet addiction and stress, anxiety, and depression in adolescents in Saudi Arabia. Journal of pediatric nursing, 2024;77:111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2024.03.007

X

Referencias

Liu Y, Liu J, Wang W. The effect of future time perspective on Internet dependence among college students in pandemic time: A moderated mediation analysis. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023;16:509–20. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S396622

X

Referencias

Young, K. S. (1998). Caught in the Net: how to recognize the sings of internet addiction and winning strategy for recovery (1an ed.). New York: Wiley.

X

Referencias

Conti MA, Jardim AP, Hearst N, Cordás TA, Tavares H, Abreu CN de. Evaluation of semantic equivalence and internal consistency of a Portuguese version of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT). Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo) 2012;39(3):106-110. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832012000300007

X

Referencias

Abreu CN, Toledo EL, Tavares H, Leite PL, Filomensky TZ. Escalas de outros comportamentos impulsivos. In: Instrumentos de avaliação em saúde mental. Artmed; 2016. Consulta: Nov 15, 2024. Disponible en: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/20573

X

Referencias

Widyanto L, McMurran M. The psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004;7(4):443–50. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2004.7.443

X

Referencias

Ferraro G, Caci B, D'Amico A, Di Blasi M. Internet addiction disorder: an Italian study. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007;10(2):170–5. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9972

X

Referencias

Khazaal Y, Billieux J, Thorens G, Khan R, Louati Y, Scarlatti E, et al. French validation of the Internet Addiction Test. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11(6):703–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0249

X

Referencias

Brito AB, Pinho L de, Brito MFSF, Messias RB, Brito KDP, Rodrigues CAO, et al. Propriedades psicométricas do Internet Addiction Test em estudantes de Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Cad Saude Publica. 2021;37(5):e00212619. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00212619

X

Referencias

Lima C de A, Messias RB, Brito AB, Ferreira TB, Barbosa MS, Pinho L de, et al. Suicidal ideation and associated factors among high school and university students: A hierarchical analysis. J Bras Psiquiatr. 2021;70(3):211–23. https://doi.org/10.1590/0047-2085000000342

X

Referencias

Glele Ahanhanzo Y, Olatoundé Agnidé Ally F, Dansou P, Sossa Jérôme C, Kpozehouen A, Sopoh GE. L’addiction à internet, une réalité contemporaine au Bénin: analyse exploratoire des facteurs associés chez des étudiants du secteur médical et paramédical en 2022. Sante Publique. 2024;36(1):109–120. https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.241.0109

X

Referencias

Coelho MMF. Banco de Dados Saúde Mental. OSF Storage. Disponível em: https://osf.io/wz6u4/files/osfstorage?view_only=a6d92ce438e543c88f493664918fb32d

X

Referencias

Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2015.

X

Referencias

DiStefano C, Morgan GB. A comparison of diagonal weighted least squares robust estimation techniques for ordinal data. Struct Equ Modeling. 2014;21(3):425–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/107055

X

Referencias

Li CH. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res Methods. 2016;48(3):936–49. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7

X

Referencias

Brown T. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. 2nd ed. Guilford Press; 2015.

X

Referencias

Melo GAA, Silva RA, Pereira FG, Lima LA, Magalhães TM, Silva VM, et al. Psychometric validation of the general comfort questionnaire in chronic patients under kidney hemodialysis. Acta Paul Enferm. 2020;33:eAPE20190258. https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2020AO02585

X

Referencias

Abbas H, Rasheed N, Mani UA, Kumar M. Internet addiction among MBBS students at a New Delhi medical college: Prevalence and determinants of a silent pandemic. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2024;13(2):730–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1242_23

X

Referencias

Shanshal SA, Al-Qazaz HK, Saadallah DA, Mohammed SY, Saber QAY, Ali MM, et al. Social media addiction and depression and their predictors among university students. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2024;36(2):123–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2022-0111

X

Referencias

Dong W, Tang H, Wu S, Lu G, Shang Y, Chen C. The effect of social anxiety on teenagers' internet addiction: the mediating role of loneliness and coping styles. BMC Psychiatry. 2024;24(1):395. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05854-5

X

Referencias

Li S, Chen X, Liu L, Sun C. The relationship between social withdrawal and problematic social media use in Chinese college students: a chain mediation of alexithymia and negative body image. BMC Psychol. 2024;12(1):246. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01755-0

X

Referencias

Oelker A, Rumpf HJ, Brand M, Muller SM. Validations of the ACSID-11 for consistent screening of specific Internet-use disorders based on ICD-11 criteria for gaming disorder: a multitrait-multimethod approach. Compr Psychiatry. 2024;132:152470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152470

X

Referencias

Ayar D, Bektas M, Bektas I, Kudubes AA, Ok YS,Altan AA, et al. The Effect of Adolescents' Internet Addiction on Smartphone Addiction. J Addict Nurs. 2017;132(4):201-2140. https://doi.org/10.1097/jan.0000000000000196

X

Referencias

Saraiva J, Esgalhado G, Pereira H, Monteiro S, Afonso RM, Loureiro M. The Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Internet Addiction Among Youth and Adults. J Addict Nurs. 2018, 29(1):13-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/JAN.0000000000000209

X

Referencias

Samaha AA, Fawaz Mbrito, El Yahfoufi N, Gebbawi M, Abdallah H, Baydoun SA, et al. Assessing the psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) among Lebanese college students. Front Public Health. 2018;6:365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00365

X

Referencias

Mokhtarinia HR, Khodaie Ardakani MR, Ebadi A, Gabel CP. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the short version of Smart Phone Addiction Scale in the Persian language. Iran J Psychiatry. 2023;18(1):35–44. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v18i1.11411

X

Referencias

Spoorthy MS, Singh LK, Tikka SK, Hara SH. Exploratory Factor Analysis of Young's Internet Addiction Test Among Professionals from India: An Online Survey. Indian J Psychol Med. 2021;43(1):65–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620932243

X

Referencias

Hashemi Y, Zarani F, Heidari M, Borhani K, Shakiba S. Psychometric properties of the Persian Internet Addiction Test-Social Networking Sites Version: Dimensionality assessment of social networking site addiction. Addict Health. 2021;13(2):95–105. https://doi.org/10.22122/ahj.v13i2.289

X

Referencias

World Health Organization. ICD-11 implementation or transition guide [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Nov 15]. Available from: https://icd.who.int/en/docs/ICD-11%20Implementation%20or%20Transition%20Guide_v105.pdf

X

Referencias

Cerqueira ML de O, Brito MCV, Sousa JP da S, Souza CDF de, Correia DS. Internet addiction disorder among medicine students in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Rev Bras Educ Med. 2023;47(2):e071. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v47.2-2022-0213

X

Referencias

Yılmaz HO, Meriç ÇS, Bülbül K, Türkkan T. Is problematic use of the Internet and smartphone predictor of unhealthy eating behaviors and abnormal body weight in Turkish young adults? J Health Psychol. 2024;30(2):186-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053241249542

X

Referencias

Hammad MA, Al-Shahrani HF. Impulsivity and aggression as risk factors for internet gaming disorder among university students. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):3712. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53807-5

X

Referencias

  1. Martins MC, Coelho M de MF, Oliveira DT de, Almeida PC de, Cavalcante VMV, Lima LR de F, et al. Anxiety among undergraduate Nursing students with mandatory curricular internship during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rev Rene. 2022;23:e81055. https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20222381055

  2. Ruiz JPG, Muñoz FC, Buenaño MAF, Hernández ALG, Cortés JJL, Mondragón JLQ, et al. Relationship between psychoactive substance, alcohol and cigarette use in nursing students. A cross-sectional study. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2024;53(1):73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcpeng.2021.11.006

  3. Graça JMB, Silva Filho JA, Costa TS, Camboim FEF, Rivera GA, Oliveira SX. Anxiety, sleep quality and daytime sleepiness in nursing students at a private institution. Rev Ciênc Plural. 2024;10(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.21680/2446-7286.2024v10n1ID34483

  4. Mendola M, Masi F, Castiglione R, Soriano A, Zazou S, Tonelli F, et al. Mental disorders among healthcare students attending a large university hospital in Milan, Italy. Med Lav. 2024;115(2):e2024009. https://doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v115i2.15168

  5. Nadarajan S, Hengudomsub P, Wacharasin C. The role of academic procrastination on Internet addiction among Thai university students: A cross-sectional study. Belitung Nursing Journal. 2023;9(4):384–90. https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.2755

  6. Ismail A. The relationship between internet addiction and stress, anxiety, and depression in adolescents in Saudi Arabia. Journal of pediatric nursing, 2024;77:111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2024.03.007

  7. Liu Y, Liu J, Wang W. The effect of future time perspective on Internet dependence among college students in pandemic time: A moderated mediation analysis. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023;16:509–20. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S396622

  8. Young, K. S. (1998). Caught in the Net: how to recognize the sings of internet addiction and winning strategy for recovery (1an ed.). New York: Wiley.

  9. Conti MA, Jardim AP, Hearst N, Cordás TA, Tavares H, Abreu CN de. Evaluation of semantic equivalence and internal consistency of a Portuguese version of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT). Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo) 2012;39(3):106-110. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832012000300007

  10. Abreu CN, Toledo EL, Tavares H, Leite PL, Filomensky TZ. Escalas de outros comportamentos impulsivos. In: Instrumentos de avaliação em saúde mental. Artmed; 2016. Consulta: Nov 15, 2024. Disponible en: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/20573

  11. Widyanto L, McMurran M. The psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004;7(4):443–50. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2004.7.443

  12. Ferraro G, Caci B, D'Amico A, Di Blasi M. Internet addiction disorder: an Italian study. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007;10(2):170–5. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9972

  13. Khazaal Y, Billieux J, Thorens G, Khan R, Louati Y, Scarlatti E, et al. French validation of the Internet Addiction Test. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11(6):703–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0249

  14. Brito AB, Pinho L de, Brito MFSF, Messias RB, Brito KDP, Rodrigues CAO, et al. Propriedades psicométricas do Internet Addiction Test em estudantes de Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Cad Saude Publica. 2021;37(5):e00212619. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00212619

  15. Lima C de A, Messias RB, Brito AB, Ferreira TB, Barbosa MS, Pinho L de, et al. Suicidal ideation and associated factors among high school and university students: A hierarchical analysis. J Bras Psiquiatr. 2021;70(3):211–23. https://doi.org/10.1590/0047-2085000000342

  16. Glele Ahanhanzo Y, Olatoundé Agnidé Ally F, Dansou P, Sossa Jérôme C, Kpozehouen A, Sopoh GE. L’addiction à internet, une réalité contemporaine au Bénin: analyse exploratoire des facteurs associés chez des étudiants du secteur médical et paramédical en 2022. Sante Publique. 2024;36(1):109–120. https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.241.0109

  17. Coelho MMF. Banco de Dados Saúde Mental. OSF Storage. Disponível em: https://osf.io/wz6u4/files/osfstorage?view_only=a6d92ce438e543c88f493664918fb32d

  18. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2015.

  19. DiStefano C, Morgan GB. A comparison of diagonal weighted least squares robust estimation techniques for ordinal data. Struct Equ Modeling. 2014;21(3):425–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/107055

  20. Li CH. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res Methods. 2016;48(3):936–49. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7

  21. Brown T. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. 2nd ed. Guilford Press; 2015.

  22. Melo GAA, Silva RA, Pereira FG, Lima LA, Magalhães TM, Silva VM, et al. Psychometric validation of the general comfort questionnaire in chronic patients under kidney hemodialysis. Acta Paul Enferm. 2020;33:eAPE20190258. https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2020AO02585

  23. Abbas H, Rasheed N, Mani UA, Kumar M. Internet addiction among MBBS students at a New Delhi medical college: Prevalence and determinants of a silent pandemic. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2024;13(2):730–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1242_23

  24. Shanshal SA, Al-Qazaz HK, Saadallah DA, Mohammed SY, Saber QAY, Ali MM, et al. Social media addiction and depression and their predictors among university students. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2024;36(2):123–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2022-0111

  25. Dong W, Tang H, Wu S, Lu G, Shang Y, Chen C. The effect of social anxiety on teenagers' internet addiction: the mediating role of loneliness and coping styles. BMC Psychiatry. 2024;24(1):395. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05854-5

  26. Li S, Chen X, Liu L, Sun C. The relationship between social withdrawal and problematic social media use in Chinese college students: a chain mediation of alexithymia and negative body image. BMC Psychol. 2024;12(1):246. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01755-0

  27. Oelker A, Rumpf HJ, Brand M, Muller SM. Validations of the ACSID-11 for consistent screening of specific Internet-use disorders based on ICD-11 criteria for gaming disorder: a multitrait-multimethod approach. Compr Psychiatry. 2024;132:152470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152470

  28. Ayar D, Bektas M, Bektas I, Kudubes AA, Ok YS,Altan AA, et al. The Effect of Adolescents' Internet Addiction on Smartphone Addiction. J Addict Nurs. 2017;132(4):201-2140. https://doi.org/10.1097/jan.0000000000000196

  29. Saraiva J, Esgalhado G, Pereira H, Monteiro S, Afonso RM, Loureiro M. The Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Internet Addiction Among Youth and Adults. J Addict Nurs. 2018, 29(1):13-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/JAN.0000000000000209

  30. Samaha AA, Fawaz Mbrito, El Yahfoufi N, Gebbawi M, Abdallah H, Baydoun SA, et al. Assessing the psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) among Lebanese college students. Front Public Health. 2018;6:365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00365

  31. Mokhtarinia HR, Khodaie Ardakani MR, Ebadi A, Gabel CP. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the short version of Smart Phone Addiction Scale in the Persian language. Iran J Psychiatry. 2023;18(1):35–44. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v18i1.11411

  32. Spoorthy MS, Singh LK, Tikka SK, Hara SH. Exploratory Factor Analysis of Young's Internet Addiction Test Among Professionals from India: An Online Survey. Indian J Psychol Med. 2021;43(1):65–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620932243

  33. Hashemi Y, Zarani F, Heidari M, Borhani K, Shakiba S. Psychometric properties of the Persian Internet Addiction Test-Social Networking Sites Version: Dimensionality assessment of social networking site addiction. Addict Health. 2021;13(2):95–105. https://doi.org/10.22122/ahj.v13i2.289

  34. World Health Organization. ICD-11 implementation or transition guide [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Nov 15]. Available from: https://icd.who.int/en/docs/ICD-11%20Implementation%20or%20Transition%20Guide_v105.pdf

  35. Cerqueira ML de O, Brito MCV, Sousa JP da S, Souza CDF de, Correia DS. Internet addiction disorder among medicine students in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Rev Bras Educ Med. 2023;47(2):e071. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v47.2-2022-0213

  36. Yılmaz HO, Meriç ÇS, Bülbül K, Türkkan T. Is problematic use of the Internet and smartphone predictor of unhealthy eating behaviors and abnormal body weight in Turkish young adults? J Health Psychol. 2024;30(2):186-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053241249542

  37. Hammad MA, Al-Shahrani HF. Impulsivity and aggression as risk factors for internet gaming disorder among university students. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):3712. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53807-5