Effect of consumer dissonance on product packaging: an empirical study of distance learning students in Lagos, Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15649/2346030X.3312Keywords:
Consumer expectation, product packaging, cognitive dissonance, customer satisfaction, NigeriaAbstract
The Axiom ‘seeing is believing’ is becoming no more imperative with the packaging of consumable goods after consumers’ experience with a brand. There is no doubt that this is one of the key drivers of brand switching. This research evaluates the effect of product packaging on post-purchase decisions of consumable products in Nigeria. Cognitive dissonance is a situation where consumers’ needs are not met and the consumer’s experience is far below the expectation. This could be a result of the failure of the packaging to adequately protect the product content; the packaging not drawing attention to the product, or it could not flaunt the egoistic nature of the consumer in terms of novelty where the consumer expected to portray his/her social class attribute. Do marketers adequately exploit the impacts/benefits of packaging to reduce consumer dissonance? What are the aftermaths of consumer dissonance on product packaging? A survey was conducted amongst marketers, distributors, and consumers of PZ Cussons PLC using random sampling. The relationships between responses were assessed and the results are presented and discussed. This study affirms that marketers should take advantage of packaging attributes to prevent or reduce the incidence of consumer dissonance. Hence, it is suggested that marketers should endeavor to invest more in product packaging design in order to gain consumer satisfaction and loyalty which could result in increased purchases.
References
Acharya, A., Blackwell, M. & Sen, M. (2018). Explaining preferences from behavior: A cognitive dissonance approach. The Journal of Politics, 80(2), pp.400-411.
Ahmed, R. R., Parmar, V. & Amin, M. A. (2014). Impact of product packaging on consumer’s buying behavior. European Journal of Scientific Research, 120(2), 145-157.
Bose, T. K. & Sarker, S. (2012). Cognitive dissonance affecting consumer buying decision making: A study based on Khulna metropolitan area. Journal of Management Research, 4(3), 191-221.
Brooksbank, R. & Fullerton, S. (2020). Cognitive dissonance revisited: A typology of B2B buyers' post-decision ‘cognitive states’ and its implications for sales professionals. Asia Pacific journal of marketing and logistics, 32(8), pp.1759-1782.
Costanzo, P. J. (2013). Revisiting cognitive dissonance theory: Pre-decisional influences and the relationship to the consumer decision-making model. Atlantic Marketing Journal, 2(3), 42-49.
Grace, P., Ling, R. P. & Osman, Z. (2022). Causes of customers’ cognitive dissonance and product return frequency: A Malaysian packaged food context. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, pp.173-203.
Effect of consumer dissonance on product packaging: An empirical study of distance learning students in Lagos, Nigeria
Aibi research, management and engineering journal. Volume 11, Number 3, September - December 2023, ISSN 2346-030X PP 91-98.
Harmon-Jones, E. (2012). Cognitive dissonance theory perspective on the role of emotion in the maintenance and changes of beliefs and attitudes. In Frijda, N. H., Manstead, A.S.R., Bem, S. (Eds.), Emotions and Beliefs: How Feelings Influence Thoughts, 8, 185-211. Retrieved from http://ebooks.cambridge.org/.
Hasan, U. & Nasreen, R. (2012). Cognitive dissonance and its impact on consumer buying behaviour. Journal of Business and Management (IOSRJBM), pp7-12.
Ladipo, P. K. & Rahim, A. G. (2013). Packaging and the Influence of Information Overload in a Low-risk Market: A Study of Grocery Products. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 1 (10), 61- 72.
Lazim, N. A. M., Sulaiman, Z., Zakuan, N., Mas’od, A., Chin, T. A. & Awang, S. R. (2020) March. Measuring post-purchase regret and impulse buying in online shopping experience from cognitive dissonance theory perspective. In 2020 6th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM) (pp. 7-13). IEEE.
Lee, L. Y. & Li, L. Y. (2013). A study on the effect of cognitive dissonance on consumption value, anticipated satisfaction and word-of-mouth communication. The Journal of Global Business Management, 9(4), 71-79.
Lifu, F. L. (2012). An analysis of the effect of product packaging on consumers’ buying choice in Calabar municipality, Cross River State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Business Management, 4(2), 186-191.
Liu, Y., Li, H., Xu, X., Kostakos, V. & Heikkilä, J. (2016). Modeling consumer switching behavior in social network games by exploring consumer cognitive dissonance and change experience. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(4), pp.801-820.
Maziriri, E. T. (2020). Green packaging and green advertising as precursors of competitive advantage and business performance among manufacturing small and medium enterprises in South Africa. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), p.1719586.
Mbataru, R. & Wanjau, K. (2013). Role of information system security in the growth of small and medium enterprises in Kenya: A survey of information communication technology firms in Nairobi. European Journal of Business and Innovation Research, 1(3), 74-83.
Musasa, T. (2014). Customer service and its impact on consumer purchasing behaviour at supermarkets in the greater area of Ethekwini. Unpublished Thesis, Durban University of Technology, Durban: South Africa.
Oladele, P. O., Olowookere, B., Okolugbo, C. N. & Adegbola, E. A. (2015). Product packaging as a predictive factor of consumer patronage of toothpaste in Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria. British Journal of Marketing Studies, 3(3), 12-28.
Oladele, P. O. & Akeke, N. I. (2012). Effect of customer satisfaction on customer loyalty among selected bank customers in Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(11), 228- 236.
Özdemir, A., Tozlu, E., Şen, E. & Ateşoğlu, H. (2016). Analyses of word-of-mouth communication and its effect on students’ university preferences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, pp.22-35.
Pandey, A. C. & Jamwal, M. (2015). Realizing the impact of cognitive dissonance in predicting consumer behaviour. J. Soc. Sci, 5, pp.3-7.
Pohtam, J. R. (2016). Impact of packaging on consumer buying behaviour. Journal of Management in Practice (Online Only), 1(1).
Raheem, A. R., Vishnu, P. A. R. M. A. R. & Ahmed, A. M. (2014). Impact of product packaging on consumer’s buying behavior. European journal of scientific research, 122(2), pp.125-134.
Ruiz-Molina, M. E. & Gil-Saura, I. (2012). Relationship and market conditions: Outcomes in marketing channels. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 19(4), pp.289-308.
Salem, M. Z. (2018). Effects of perfume packaging on Basque female consumers purchase decision in Spain. Management Decision, 56(8), pp.1748-1768.
Sharma, M. K. (2014). The impact on consumer buying behaviour: Cognitive Dissonance. Global Journal of Finance and Management, 6(9), 833-840.
The Industry Council for Research on Packaging and the Environment (INCPEN) (2014). Packaging Innovation Responding to Consumers’ Needs and Reducing Environmental Impact Kotler and Armstrong (2012).
Vaidis, D. (2014). Cognitive dissonance theory. London: Oxford University Press.
Wilkins, S., Beckenuyte, C. & Butt, M. M. (2016), Consumers’ behavioural intentions after experiencing deception or cognitive dissonance caused by deceptive packaging, package downsizing or slack filling. European Journal of Marketing, 50(1/2), 213-235.
Zekiri, J. & Hasani, V. V. (2015). The Role and Impact of the Packaging Effect on Consumer Buying Behaviour. Ecoforum Journal, 4. Special Issue 1: 232- 240.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Altmetrics
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2024 AiBi Journal of Research, Administration and Engineering
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal offers open access under a Creative Commons Attibution License
![Licencia Creative Commons](https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is under license Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0).