Floristic Composition and Structural Patterns of Riparian Vegetation in the La Vega River Micro-Watershed, Tunja–Boyacá, Colombia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15649/2346075X.5296

Keywords:

Acacia decurrens, biodiversity, watershed, woody flora, introduced species.

Abstract

Introduction. Urban riparian corridors are critical for biodiversity conservation, hydrological regulation, and ecosystem connectivity. However, anthropogenic pressures and extreme climate events have disrupted their ecological integrity, particularly in rapidly urbanizing Andean regions. Objectives. This study aims to characterize the floristic composition and structural attributes of woody vegetation in a riparian section of the La Vega River microwatershed (Tunja, Boyacá), which was disturbed by dredging activities following the 2010– 2011 La Niña event. Materials and methods. Field sampling was conducted through 20 transects (50 × 2 m; total area 0.2 ha) along both riverbanks within the university campus. All woody individuals with a diameter at breast height (DBH) > 1 cm were recorded. Structural parameters (density, dominance, frequency, Importance Value Index), species richness estimators, and diversity indices (Shannon-Wiener, Simpson, Margalef) were calculated. Results. A total of 782 individuals were recorded, comprising 37 species, 28 genera, and 21 families. The family Fabaceae was dominant, with exotic species such as Acacia decurrens (IVI = 139%), A. mearnsii, and A. melanoxylon prevailing across the site. Native species including Juglans neotropica, Sambucus peruviana, Quercus humboldtii, and Prunus serotina showed lower abundance but play important ecological roles. Conclusions. The high dominance of exotic Acacia species indicates ongoing ecological alteration within the riparian corridor. Active management and restoration strategies are needed to curb the spread of invasive species and promote the recovery of native riparian vegetation.

References

1. Chaname Zapata FC, Custodio Villanueva M, Yaranga Cano RM, Pantoja Esquivel RA. Diversity of the riparian vegetation of high Andean wetlands of the Junín region, Peru. Ambiente & Água – An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Science. 2019;14(3):e2271. https://doi.org/10.4136/ambi-agua.2271

2. Papazian G, Kutschker AM, Rovere AE. Riparian forests: A temporal analysis of their ecological status in urban river systems of the Andean Patagonia, Chubut, Argentina. Journal of Urban Ecology. 2024;10(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juae021

3. Aguirre LF, Delgado Burgoa RR, Vimercati AC, editores. Corredores biológicos urbanos y servicios ecosistémicos en el municipio de Cochabamba, Bolivia. Cochabamba: Universidad Mayor de San Simón; 2023.

4. Brierley GJ. Finding the voice of the river: beyond restoration and management. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27068-1

5. Martin LA, Evette A, Bergès L. Pour une meilleure prise en compte de la connectivité écologique dans l’aménagement et la gestion des berges de cours d’eau. Sciences Eaux Territoires. 2020;15(36):1–4. https://doi.org/10.18845/rfmk.v15i36.3426

6. Naiman RJ, Decamps H, Pollock M. The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecological Applications. 1993;3(2):209–212. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941822

7. Kinnoumè SMD, Adomou S, Gouwakinnou GN, Houéhanou TD. Community Perception of Riparian Corridors Ecosystem Services and Implications for Environmental Education in Upper Oueme Catchment in Benin, West Africa. Open Journal of Ecology. 2024;14(2):125–147. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2024.142008

8. Riis T, Kelly Quinn M, Aguiar FC, Manolaki P, Bruno D, Bejarano MD, et al. Global overview of ecosystem services provided by riparian vegetation. BioScience. 2020;70(6):501–514. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa041

9. Naiman RJ, Decamps H. The ecology of interfaces: Riparian zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1997;28:621–658. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621

10. Jiang Y, Huang J, Shi T, Wang H. Interaction of Urban Rivers and Green Space Morphology to Mitigate the Urban Heat Island Effect: Case Based Comparative Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(21):11404. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111404

11. Mohajerani A, Bakaric J, Jeffrey Bailey T. The urban heat island effect, its causes, and mitigation, with reference to the thermal properties of asphalt concrete. J Environ Manage. 2017;197:522–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.095

12. Vásquez AE. Infraestructura verde, servicios ecosistémicos y sus aportes para enfrentar el cambio climático en ciudades: El caso del corredor ribereño del río Mapocho en Santiago de Chile. Rev Geografía Norte Grande. 2016;(63):63–86. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34022016000100005

13. Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales (IDEAM). Estudio Nacional del Agua 2010. Bogotá: IDEAM; 2010.

14. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). Valoración de daños y pérdidas. Ola invernal en Colombia, 2010 2011. Bogotá: Misión BID / CEPAL; 2012.

15. Hoyos N, Escobar J, Restrepo JC, Arango S, Ortiz JC. Impact of the 2010 2011 La Niña phenomenon on the Magdalena River basin, Colombia. Hydrol Sci J. 2013;58(4):771–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.11.018

16. Acero Nitola DC, Cortés Pérez DC. Restauración ecológica en la microcuenca del río La Vega: un estudio de caso. Rev Acad Colomb Cienc Exactas Fís Natur. 2014;38(147):281–291. https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.76

17. Perico Granados N, Arévalo Algarra NR, Reyes Rodríguez HM, Perico Martínez CA, Vera CA, Monroy J. Flood sites caused by the La Vega and Jordán rivers, Tunja. Tecnura. 2021;25(67):86–101. https://doi.org/10.14483/22487638.15248

18. Gil Alvarado LY. Estrategias para la gestión del riesgo ante inundaciones en zonas localizadas del municipio de Tunja, Colombia [tesis de maestría]. Tunja: Universidad Santo Tomás; 2019.

19. Duque Escobar G, Álvarez León R, González González H. Cambio climático en Colombia: Cap. I La amenaza. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 2023.

20. Francois M, Rebello de Aguiar Junior T, Schramm Mielke M, Rousseau AN, Faria D, Mariano Neto E. Interactions between forest cover and watershed hydrology: A state of the art review. Preprints. 2024. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.0165.v1

21. Ward JV, Tockner K, Schiemer F. Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity. Regul Rivers Res Manag. 1999;15(1 3):125–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199901/06)15:1/3

22. White PS. Pattern, process, and natural disturbance in vegetation. Bot Rev. 1979;45(3):229–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860857

23. Alcaldía de Tunja. Diagnóstico Plan de Ordenamiento Territorial 2023 2025. Tunja; 2023.

24. Concejo Municipal de Tunja. Acuerdo municipal No. 0016 de 2014 (28 de julio de 2014), Plan de Ordenamiento Territorial, Anexo Físico Biótico. Diario Oficial. 2014.

25. Rangel Ch O, Velázquez A. Métodos de estudio de la vegetación. En: Rangel O, Lowy P, Aguilar P, editores. Colombia diversidad biótica II: Tipos de vegetación en Colombia. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 1997. p. 59–87.

26. Gentry AH. Patterns of neotropical plant species diversity. En: Hecht MK, Wallace B, Prance GT, editores. Evolutionary Biology. Boston, MA: Springer; 1982. p. 1–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6968-8_1

27. Villarreal H, Álvarez M, Córdoba S, Escobar F, Fagua G, Gast F, et al. Manual de métodos para el desarrollo de inventarios de biodiversidad. 2ª ed. Bogotá: Instituto Alexander von Humboldt; 2006.

28. Colwell RK. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9.1.0 [Internet]. 2016.

29. Buitrago Campos M. La biodiversidad urbana en Tunja (Boyacá Colombia): análisis de la situación actual y propuestas para su potenciación [tesis de maestría]. Barcelona: Universidad de Barcelona; 2020.

30. Waked N, Jaime C. A Local and Historical Perspective on Disaster Risk Reduction: Tunja, Colombia Case Study. Int J Disaster Risk Sci. 2025;16:44–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-025-00624-7

31. Magurran AE. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press; 1988. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0

32. Espinosa Pinzón BF. Modelo de análisis espacial como herramienta de intervención para el manejo integral de Acacia decurrens en el embalse de Tominé [tesis de especialización]. Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 2023.

33. Rojas B SL. Estructura y composición florística de la vegetación en proceso de restauración en los Cerros Orientales de Bogotá (Colombia). Caldasia. 2017;39(1):124–139. https://doi.org/10.15446/caldasia.v39n1.60084

34. Cárdenas López D, Baptiste MP, Castaño N, editores. Plantas exóticas con alto potencial de invasión en Colombia. Bogotá: Instituto Alexander von Humboldt; 2017.

35. Chamorro D, Rey A. Acacia decurrens. Incorporación y utilización de árboles y arbustos en sistemas de producción ganadera. Bogotá: CORPOICA; 2012. p. 13–15.

36. Alba W, Díaz M. Listado de plantas ornamentales urbanas de Tunja, Boyacá, Colombia. Mutis. 2020;10(1):57–78. https://doi.org/10.21789/22561498.1602

37. Cubides Vargas D. Análisis de la composición del arbolado urbano de la medialuna del sur de Bogotá D.C., Colombia [tesis de pregrado]. Bogotá: Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas; 2022.

38. Díaz Espinosa AM, Díaz Triana JE, Vargas O, editores. Catálogo de plantas invasoras de los humedales de Bogotá. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

39. Aronson MF, Patel MV, O’Neill KM, Ehrenfeld JG. Urban riparian systems function as corridors for both native and invasive plant species. Biol Invasions. 2017;19(12):3645–3657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1583-1

40. Pennington DN, Hansel JR, Gorchov DL. Urbanization and riparian forest woody communities: diversity, composition, and structure within a metropolitan landscape. Biol Conserv. 2010;143:182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.002

41. Corporación Autónoma Regional de Cundinamarca. Plan de prevención, manejo control de las poblaciones de Acacia decurrens Willd en la jurisdicción CAR. 2020.

42. Matthews S, Brand K, Ziller SR, Zalba S, Iriarte A, Baptiste MP, et al. Sudamérica invadida. Ciudad del Cabo: Secretaría del Programa Mundial sobre Especies Invasoras (GISP); 2005.

43. Solorza BJ. Evaluación de la regeneración de Acacia decurrens, Acacia melanoxylon y Ulex europaeus en áreas en proceso de restauración ecológica. Revista Luna Azul. 2012;34:66–80.

44. Le Maitre DC, Gaertner M, Marchante E, Ens EJ, Holmes PM, Pauchard A, Richardson DM. Impacts of invasive Australian acacias: implications for management and restoration. Divers Distrib. 2011;17(5):1015–1029. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00816.x

45. Lusizi Z, Motsi H, Nyambo P, Elephant DE. Black (Acacia mearnsii) and silver wattle (Acacia dealbata) invasive tree species impact on soil physicochemical properties in South Africa: A systematic literature review. Heliyon. 2024;10:e24102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24102

46. Vieites Blanco C, González Prieto SJ. Invasiveness, ecological impacts and control of acacias in southwestern Europe – a review. Web Ecol. 2020;20:33–51. https://doi.org/10.5194/we-20-33-2020

47. Richardson DM, Kluge RL. Seed banks of invasive Australian Acacia species in South Africa: Role in invasiveness and options for management. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 2008;10(3):161–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2008.03.001

48. Sono Toledo DD, Carvajal Benavides JG, Arcos Unigarro CR, Albuja Illescas LM, Aroca Farez AE. Árboles y sociedad: percepciones sobre Juglans neotropica Diels. Perfiles. 2024;32(1):55–58. https://doi.org/10.47187/perf.v1i32.299

49. Ramírez F. Nogal (Juglans neotropica Diels): the case study of a venerable and endangered tree from Bogotá, Colombia. Arboricultural Journal. 2025;1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.2025.2468572

50. Carrasco Baquero JC, Lema Palaquibay LF, Chávez Velásquez CR, Caballero Serrano V, Itle R, Chavez DJ. Social perception of the ecosystem services of Prunus serotina subsp. capuli in the Andes of Ecuador. Land. 2023;12(5):1086. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12051086

51. DAMA (Departamento Técnico Administrativo del Medio Ambiente). Guía técnica para la restauración de áreas de ronda y nacederos del Distrito Capital. Bogotá: DAMA; 2004.

52. Naiman RJ, Decamps H, McClain ME. Riparia: Ecology, Conservation, and Management of Streamside Communities. Elsevier; 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012663315-3/50010-1

53. Mata Balderas JM, Alanís Rodríguez E, Mora Olivo A, Collantes Chávez Costa A. Woody plant community structure and composition of an urban riparian forest in Monterrey metropolitan area, Northeast Mexico. J Torrey Bot Soc. 2022;149(3):210–218. https://doi.org/10.3159/TORREY-D-21-00030.1

54. Martin FM, Janssen P, Bergès L, Dupont B, Evette A. Higher structural connectivity and resistance against invasions of soil bioengineering over hard engineering for riverbank stabilisation. Wetl Ecol Manag. 2021;29(1):27–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-020-09765-6

55. Canizales Velázquez PA, Alanís Rodríguez E, García García SA, Holguín Estrada VA, Collantes Chávez Costa A. Estructura y diversidad arbórea de un bosque de galería urbano en el río Camachito, noreste de México. Polibotánica. 2021;(51):91–105. https://doi.org/10.18387/polibotanica.51.6

56. Dixon MD, McBride MC, Merritt DM, Wohl EE. Vegetation succession, wood production, and wood residence time in riparian forests: implications for restoration and stream function. Ecol Appl. 2018;28(1):62–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1633

Downloads

Published

2025-10-20 — Updated on 2025-12-12

Versions

How to Cite

Sánchez Chavez, E. C., & Galvis Rueda, M. (2025). Floristic Composition and Structural Patterns of Riparian Vegetation in the La Vega River Micro-Watershed, Tunja–Boyacá, Colombia. Innovaciencia, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.15649/2346075X.5296 (Original work published 2025)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Issue

Section

Original research and innovation article

Similar Articles

1-10 of 27

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.