El rediseño del Palacio del Presidente en Kazajistán
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15649/2346075X.2955Keywords:
Public park making, Landscape design, Global features of a public park, Global cities index, Social activities city indexAbstract
Introduction: This paper deals with the renovation process of the President’s Palace in Kazakhstan. Diversity is one of our main features expressing the nationwide experience along with its successes and failures. The spatial quality of some public spaces provided them permanence and "sustainability". The aesthetic values of architectural and urban spaces are often determinant factors for urban environmental quality. In fact, our research strategy combines the study of spatial practice and usage with the analysis of design quality. The rejuvenation of urban spaces is a promising experience contributing socially, economically, and physically to regenerating the local urban environment and leisure activity. Sustainable urban development provides city designers with criteria of social and ecological rationality that are different from those available in the market. Consequently, the concept of sustainability becomes the keystone of the urban development process. Materials and Methods: This paper puts forward a question about the global features of a public park and continues the discussion on keeping a balance between local architecture and the global ‘public park making’ trend the method employed is qualitative interviews, observations, and walking tours with public space users. An amount of data is collected for environmental assessment. Results and Discussion: The renovated park shows the new way public space is oriented. In President's Palace, a new logic of urban publicity was assembled and built into the landscape. we analyzed the social and technical means. New public spaces of this sort promulgate a conception of the public that not only combine with discourses of democratization, citizenship, and self–development and is connected ever more firmly to consumption and commercial. Conclusions: We also do research on the global features of a public park and discuss keeping a balance between local architecture and the global public park-making trend, as well as public facilities and profit, and the role of nature as a universal remedy and tool in reshaping the image of cities.
References
Challenges, dilemmas and commitments of a common urban agenda executive summary Forum of Ministers and High Authorities of Housing and urban development of Latin America and the Caribbean. 2016. Available at: https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/40657/4/S1600985_en.pdf Accessed: June 22, 2022.
The value of urban design, A research project commissioned by CABE and DETR to examine the value added by good urban design. 2001. Available at: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/fileadmin/uploads/dc/Documents/the-value-of-urban-design_0.pdf Accessed: June 22, 2022.
Johnson-Laird PN. Mental models in cognitive science. Univ of Sussex Cognit Sci. 1980. 4: 71-115. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0401_4
Sanoff H. Visual research methods in design. London: Routledge; 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315541822
Bell PA, Greene TC, Fisher JD, Baum A. Environmental psychology. New York: Harcourt College Publishers; 2001.
Ash MG. Gestalt psychology in German culture, 1890-1967: Holism and the quest for objectitavy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
Kara B. Landscape design and cognitive psychology. World Conf on Psych & Sociol. 2012. 2012: 54-62.
Pretty J, Barton J, Bragg RE, Sellens M. Green exercise in the UK countryside: Effects on health and psychological well-being, and implications for policy and planning. J of Env Plan & Manag. 2007. 50(2): 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560601156466
Lynch K. City sense and city design: Writings and projects. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 1960.
Daniel TC. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landsc & Urb Plan. 2001. 54(1): 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4
Taylor K. The historic urban landscape paradigm and cities as cultural landscapes. Challenging orthodoxy in urban conservation. Lands Res Vol. 2016. 41(4): 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1156066
Heijgen E. Human landscape perception. 2013. Available at: https://www.highweald.org/downloads/publications/uk-landscape-research-reports/1057-human-landscape-perception-of-the-high-weald/file.html Accessed: June 22, 2022.
Rapoport A. Human aspects of urban form: Towards a man—environment approach to urban and regional planning. Oxford: Pergamon; 2013.
Köpsel V. New spaces for climate change: The societal construction of landscapes in times of changing climate. Berlin: Springer; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23313-6
Pearce D, Markandya A, Barbier E. Blueprint for a green economy. London: Routledge; 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315070223
Bibby P, Henneberry J, Halleux J-M. Incremental residential densification and urban spatial justice: The case of England between 2001 and 2011. Urban Stud. 2020. 58(31): 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020936967
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
All articles published in this scientific journal are protected by copyright. The authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits sharing the work with authorship recognition and without commercial purposes.
Readers may copy and distribute the material from this journal issue for non-commercial purposes in any medium, provided the original work is cited and credit is given to the authors and the journal.
Any commercial use of the material from this journal is strictly prohibited without written permission from the copyright holder.
For more information on the copyright of the journal and open access policies, please visit our website.









