Procesamiento térmico-asistido por ultrasonido: Seguridad microbiana y propiedades fisicoquímicas del Tejuino, bebida fermentada tradicional Mexicana

Autores/as

  • Luis Miguel Anaya Esparza Centro de Estudios para la Agricultura, la Alimentación y la Crisis Climática, Centro Universitario de Los Altos, Universidad de Guadalajara, Av. Rafael Casillas Aceves No. 1200, 47620, Tepatitlán de Morelos, Jalisco, México https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9194-1719
  • Miguel Ángel Solano Cornejo Universidad Nacional Pedro Ruiz Gallo, Escuela Profesional de Ingeniería en Industrias Alimentarias, Juan XXIII 391, 14013, Lambayeque, Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8221-7443
  • Zuamí Villagrán Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Centro Universitario de Los Altos, Universidad de Guadalajara, Av. Rafael Casillas Aceves No. 1200, 47620, Tepatitlán de Morelos, Jalisco, México https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9871-5407
  • José Martín Ruvalcaba Gómez Centro Nacional de Recursos Genéticos, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Boulevard de la Biodiversidad 400, 47600, Tepatitlán de Morelos, Jalisco, México https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8124-6410
  • Jorge Manuel Silva Jara Departamento de Farmacobiología, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías, Universidad de Guadalajara, Marcelino García Barragán 1421, 44430, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8742-6247
  • Fernando Martínez Esquivias Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Centro Universitario de Los Altos, Universidad de Guadalajara, Av. Rafael Casillas Aceves No. 1200, 47620, Tepatitlán de Morelos, Jalisco, México https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5059-3153
  • Edward Florencio Aurora Vigo Escuela de Ingeniería Agroindustrial y Comercio Exterior, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Chiclayo 14000, Peru https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9731-4318

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15649/2346075X.5567

Palabras clave:

Bebida tradicional, Bebida de maíz, Nixtamalización, Tejuino comercial, Tratamiento de ultrasonido, Tratamiento térmico a bajas temperaturas, Seguridad microbiana

Resumen

Introducción. El tejuino es una bebida mexicana artesanal fermentada a base de maíz con una vida útil limitada, lo que dificulta su producción industrial. A pesar de su importancia cultural, las investigaciones sobre métodos de seguridad microbiana siguen siendo escasas. Objetivos. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el impacto del procesamiento térmico asistido por ultrasonidos (USTP) en la seguridad microbiana y las propiedades fisicoquímicas del tejuino. Materiales y Métodos. El tejuino comercial (200 mL) se sometió a ultrasonido (0,5 kJ/ml a 20 °C), seguido de tratamiento térmico a 45-65 °C (USTP45–USTP65). Se utilizaron muestras frescas, pasteurizadas (65 °C/30 min) y tratadas con ultrasonido como controles. Se evaluaron parámetros microbiológicos [bacterias mesófilas aeróbicas (BMA), bacterias coliformes (BC), mohos y levaduras (ML), bacterias del ácido láctico (BAL)] y fisicoquímicos (pH, acidez, sólidos solubles, índice de oscurecimiento, densidad, viscosidad, conductividad, turbidez, color), así como antioxidantes [fenoles solubles totales (PST), DPPH, ABTS, FRAP]. Resultados. Los recuentos de BMA, BC y ML disminuyeron con el USTP, con concentraciones adecuadas de BAL, efecto  dependiente de la temperatura (USTP45-USTP65) al comparar con los controles. Excepto la densidad, los demás parámetros fisicoquímicos se vieron influenciados por el USTP. Los tratamientos USTP45, USTP50 y USTP55 mostraron contenido de TSP y actividad antioxidante por DPPH y ABTS similares a los controles fresco y tratado con ultrasonido, mientras que, los valores de FRAP decrementan a temperaturas >50 °C. Conclusiones. El procesamiento térmico asistido por ultrasonido puede ser una alternativa viable para la fabricación industrial de tejuino.

Referencias

1. Ramírez-Damián M, Garfias-Noguez C, Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Sánchez-Pardo ME. Synbiotic microencapsulation of Lactobacillus strains from Mexican fermented beverages for enhanced probiotic functionality. Molecules. 2025;30(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules30051185

2. García-Reyes RA, García-Cancino A, Arrevillaga-Boni G, Espinoza-Monje M, Gutiérrez-Zamorano C, Arrizon J, et al. Identification and characterization of probiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum BI-59.1 isolated from tejuino and its capacity to produce biofilms. Curr Microbiol. 2023;80(7):220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00284-023-03319-8

3. Rubio-Castillo ÁE, Santiago-López L, Vallejo-Cordoba B, Hernández-Mendoza A, Sáyago-Ayerdi SG, González-Córdova AF. Traditional non-distilled fermented beverages from Mexico to based on maize: An approach to Tejuino beverage. Int J Gastron Food Sci. 2021;23(100283):100283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2020.100283

4. Ojeda-Linares C, Álvarez-Ríos GD, Figueredo-Urbina CJ, Islas LA, Lappe-Oliveras P, Nabhan GP, et al. Traditional fermented beverages of Mexico: A biocultural unseen foodscape. Foods. 2021;10(10):2390. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10102390

5. Yañez-Ñeco C, Rodriguez-Colinas B, Amaya-Delgado L, Ballesteros A, Gschaedler A, Plou F, et al. Galactooligosaccharide production from Pantoea anthophila strains isolated from “tejuino”, a Mexican traditional fermented beverage. Catalysts. 2017;7(8):242. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/catal7080242

6. Elizondo C, Argentina D. El tejuino, el bate y la tuba bebidas refrescantes : símbolos que perduran de generación en generación en el estado de Colima. Razón y Palabra. 2016;20(94):7. Available from: URL: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=199547464007

7. Rubio-Castillo ÁE, Méndez-Romero JI, Reyes-Díaz R, Santiago-López L, Vallejo-Cordoba B, Hernández-Mendoza A, et al. Tejuino, a traditional fermented beverage: Composition, safety quality, and microbial identification. Foods. 2021;10(10):2446. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10102446

8. Pérez-Armendáriz B, Cardoso-Ugarte GA. Traditional fermented beverages in Mexico: Biotechnological, nutritional, and functional approaches. Food Res Int. 2020;136(109307):109307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109307

9. Deak T, Mohácsi-Farkas C. Thermal Treatment. In: Food Safety Management. Elsevier; 2023. p. 405–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820013-1.00008-5

10. Kilic-Akyilmaz M, Kurt C, Uzunoglu TP, Turkmen F, Gunes G, Erem E. Comparison of high intensity ultrasound and heat treatment for extending shelf life of a fermented milk beverage. Int Dairy J. 2023;141(105617):105617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2023.105617

11. Morales-de la Peña M, Miranda-Mejía GA, Martín-Belloso O. Recent trends in fermented beverages processing: The use of emerging technologies. Beverages. 2023;9(2):51. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/beverages9020051

12. Monteiro SHMC, Silva EK, Alvarenga VO, Moraes J, Freitas MQ, Silva MC, et al. Effects of ultrasound energy density on the non-thermal pasteurization of chocolate milk beverage. Ultrason Sonochem. 2018;42:1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.11.015

13. Anaya-Esparza LM, Velázquez-Estrada RM, Roig AX, García-Galindo HS, Sayago-Ayerdi SG, Montalvo-González E. Thermosonication: An alternative processing for fruit and vegetable juices. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2017;61:26–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2016.11.020

14. Perera CO, Alzahrani MAJ. Ultrasound as a pre-treatment for extraction of bioactive compounds and food safety: A review. Lebenson Wiss Technol. 2021;142(111114):111114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111114

15. Herrera-Ponce AL, Salmeron-Ochoa I, Rodriguez-Figueroa JC, Santellano-Estrada E, Garcia-Galicia IA, Alarcon-Rojo AD. High-intensity ultrasound as pre-treatment in the development of fermented whey and oat beverages: effect on the fermentation, antioxidant activity and consumer acceptance. J Food Sci Technol. 2022;59(2):796–804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13197-021-05074-9

16. Pingret D, Fabiano-Tixier A-S, Petitcolas E, Canselier J-P, Chemat F. First investigation on ultrasound-assisted preparation of food products: sensory and physicochemical characteristics. J Food Sci. 2011;76(2):C287-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.02019.x

17. Solano-Cornejo MA, Rojas ML. Energy density and mode of ultrasound application in fresh cow milk: Microbiological, physicochemical, and techno-functional properties. Braz J Food Technol. 2025;28(e2024067). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-6723.06724

18. Guodong Z, Martine F, Robert JB. BAM chapter 3: Aerobic plate count. In: Bacteriological Analytical Manual. U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2025. Available from: URL: https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bam-chapter-3-aerobic-plate-count

19. Peter F, Stephen DW, Michael AG, William B. Chapter 4: Enumeration of Escherichia coli and the Coliform Bacteria. In: Bacteriological Analytical Manual. U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2020. Available from: URL: https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bam-chapter-4-enumeration-escherichia-coli-and-coliform-bacteria

20. Valerie T, Michael ES, Philip BM, Herbert AK, Ruth B. BAM chapter 18: Yeasts, molds and mycotoxins. In: Bacteriological Analytical Manual. U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2001. Available from: URL: https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bam-chapter-18-yeasts-molds-and-mycotoxins

21. Arteaga-Garibay RI, Delgado-Macuil RJ, Gómez-Godínez LJ, Cruz-Cárdenas CI, Villagrán Z, Giono-Cerezo S, et al. Identification, viability, and membrane potential during the cryopreservation of autochthonous lactic-acid bacteria isolated from artisanal Adobera cheese from Los Altos de jalisco. Microbiol Res. 2023;14(4):1820–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres14040124

22. Horwitz W, Latimer G, editores. Official methods of analysis of association official of agricultural chemists international. Washington (DC: AOAC; 2005).

23. Annan NT, Poll L, Sefa-Dedeh S, Plahar WA, Jakobsen M. Volatile compounds produced by Lactobacillus fermentum, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida krusei in single starter culture fermentations of Ghanaian maize dough. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(3):462–74. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01852.x

24. Yusof S, Ibrahim N. Quality of soursop juice after pectinase enzyme treatment. Food Chem. 1994;51(1):83–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90052-3

25. Cohen E, Birk Y, Mannheim CH, Saguy IS. A rapid method to monitor quality of apple juice during thermal processing. Lebenson Wiss Technol. 1998;31(7–8):612–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/fstl.1998.0385

26. Ma Y, Yin X, Bi X, Su F, Liang Z, Luo M, et al. Physicochemical properties and bioactive compounds of fermented pomegranate juice as affected by high-pressure processing and thermal treatment. Int J Food Prop. 2019;22(1):1250–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2019.1640737

27. Pérez-Jiménez J, Arranz S, Tabernero M, Díaz- Rubio ME, Serrano J, Goñi I, et al. Updated methodology to determine antioxidant capacity in plant foods, oils and beverages: Extraction, measurement and expression of results. Food Res Int. 2008;41(3):274–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2007.12.004

28. Montreau FR. Sur le dosage des composés phénoliques totaux dans les vins par la méthode Folin-Ciocalteu. OENO One. 1972;6(4):397–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.1972.6.4.2071

29. Prior RL, Wu X, Schaich K. Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53(10):4290–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf0502698

30. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;26(9–10):1231–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0891-5849(98)00315-3

31. Benzie IF, Strain JJ. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem. 1996;239(1):70–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/abio.1996.0292

32. Singla M, Sit N. Application of ultrasound in combination with other technologies in food processing: A review. Ultrason Sonochem. 2021;73(105506):105506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105506

33. Kaveh S, Gholamhosseinpour A, Hashemi SMB, Jafarpour D, Castagnini JM, Phimolsiripol Y, et al. Recent advances in ultrasound application in fermented and non‐fermented dairy products: antibacterial and bioactive properties. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2023;58(7):3591–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.16457

34. Solano-Cornejo MA. Estabilización microbiológica de leche fresca de vaca (Bos taurus) por pretratamiento ultrasónico y tratamiento térmico de baja temperatura. Pakamuros. 2024;12(1):91–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.37787/6x1h5q49

35. Meena L, Malini B, Byresh TS, Sunil CK, Rawson A, Venkatachalapathy N. Ultrasound as a pre-treatment in millet-based probiotic beverage: It’s effect on fermentation kinetics and beverage quality. Food Chem Adv. 2024;4(100631):100631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.focha.2024.100631

36. Hao F, Fu N, Ndiaye H, Woo MW, Jeantet R, Chen XD. Thermotolerance, survival, and stability of lactic acid bacteria after spray drying as affected by the increase of growth temperature. Food Bioproc Tech. 2021;14(1):120–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11947-020-02571-1

37. Muñoz R, Viveros N, Bevilacqua A, Pérez MS, Arévalo-Villena M. Effects of ultrasound treatments on wine microorganisms. Ultrason Sonochem. 2021;79(105775):105775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105775

38. Deng Y, Bi H, Yin H, Yu J, Dong J, Yang M, et al. Influence of ultrasound assisted thermal processing on the physicochemical and sensorial properties of beer. Ultrason Sonochem. 2018;40(Pt A):166–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.07.017

39. Sharma HK, Kaur J, Sarkar BC, Singh C, Singh B. Effect of pretreatment conditions on physicochemical parameters of carrot juice. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2009;44(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01462.x

40. Kruus S. Sonochemical formation of nitrate and nitrite in water. Ultrason Sonochem. 2000;7(3): 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4177(99)00043-7

41. Piazza L, Picchi V, Cortellino G, Faoro F, Masseroni E, Girotto F. Effect of high frequency ultrasound pre-treatment on nutritional and technological properties of tomato paste. Food Sci Technol Int. 2022;28(2):180–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10820132211003788

42. Bhutkar S, Brandão TRS, Silva CLM, Miller FA. Application of ultrasound treatments in the processing and production of high-quality and safe-to-drink kiwi juice. Foods. 2024;13(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods13020328

43. Valdramidis VP, Cullen PJ, Tiwari BK, O’Donnell CP. Quantitative modelling approaches for ascorbic acid degradation and non-enzymatic browning of orange juice during ultrasound processing. J Food Eng. 2010;96(3):449–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.08.025

44. Anaya-Esparza LM, Méndez-Robles MD, Pérez-Larios A, Yahia EM, Montalvo-González E. Nutrimental composition and physicochemical parameters of thermosonicated soursop nectar. TIP Revista especializada en ciencias químico-biológicas. 2018;21(1):5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recqb.2017.08.001

45. Zou Y, Jiang A. Effect of ultrasound treatment on quality and microbial load of carrot juice. Food Sci Technol. 2016;36(1):111–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-457x.0061

46. Dahdouh L, Wisniewski C, Kapitan-Gnimdu A, Servent A, Dornier M, Delalonde M. Identification of relevant physicochemical characteristics for predicting fruit juices filterability. Sep Purif Technol. 2015;141:59–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2014.11.030

47. Dahdouh L, Wisniewski C, Kapitan-Gnimdu A, Servent A, Dornier M, Delalonde M. Identification of relevant physicochemical characteristics for predicting fruit juices filterability. Sep Pur Technol. 2015;141(12):59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2014.11.030

48. Tiwari BK, Muthukumarappan K, O’Donnell CP, Cullen PJ. Colour degradation and quality parameters of sonicated orange juice using response surface methodology. Lebenson Wiss Technol. 2008;41(10):1876–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2007.11.016

49. Iftikhar M, Zhang H, Iftikhar A, Raza A, Begum N, Tahamina A, et al. Study on optimization of ultrasonic assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from rye bran. Lebenson Wiss Technol. 2020;134(110243):110243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110243

50. Rubio-Castillo AE, Zamora-Gasga VM, Sánchez-Burgos JA, Ruiz-Valdiviezo VM, Montalvo-González E, Velázquez-Estrada RM, et al. Gut metabolites produced during in vitro colonic fermentation of the indigestible fraction of a maize-based traditional Mexican fermented beverage, Tejuino. Food Chem. 2022;5(100150):100150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fochms.2022.100150

Descargas

Publicado

2026-03-03

Cómo citar

Anaya Esparza, L. M., Solano Cornejo, M. Ángel ., Villagrán, Z. ., Ruvalcaba Gómez , J. M., Silva Jara, J. M. ., Martínez Esquivias , F., & Aurora Vigo , E. F. (2026). Procesamiento térmico-asistido por ultrasonido: Seguridad microbiana y propiedades fisicoquímicas del Tejuino, bebida fermentada tradicional Mexicana. Innovaciencia, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.15649/2346075X.5567

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Número

Sección

Artículo original de investigación e innovacion

Artículos similares

1-10 de 56

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.