Continuing bonds, men, and women in bereavement: A secondary analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.3039Keywords:
Bereavement, Nursing, Perceptual Closure, Grief, Mental HealthAbstract
Introduction: Grief is a complex response to the loss of a loved one with different ways of adjustment, and Continuing Bonds are part of its nature. Objective: To analyze men’s and women’s experiences of grief in terms of perception of closeness to the deceased, Continuing Bonds, and Nursing diagnoses. Materials and Methods: Secondary analysis. A convenience sample of 251 Spanish-speaking adult mourners, residents of the Canary Islands, was used. Data was collected via an online survey consisting of socio-demographic, health, and loss-related characteristics, the Inclusion of Other in the Self scale, the Continuing Bonds Scale, and Nursing diagnoses. Descriptive analysis, Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman’s coefficient were used. Level of significance p<0.05. Results: The mean age was 45.09 years ±10.38 years; 22.70% (57) were male, and 77.30% (194) were female. Significant differences were found between men and women in the perception of closeness to the deceased (p<0.05), and significant relationships were found between the perception of closeness to the deceased, Continuing Bonds, and Nursing diagnoses (p=0.001). Discussion: A comparison of the results with other studies shows some consistencies and differences in the behavior of the variables, demonstrating the dynamism of the phenomenon. Conclusions: For this group of participants, the experience of grief would not be linked to social constructions of gender but instead respond to a coping response according to their needs. Understanding the grieving process allows Mental Health Nursing to implement interventions based on the Nursing Process.
How to cite this article: Martínez-Esquivel Daniel, Muñoz-Rojas Derby, Brito-Brito Pedro Ruymán, Rodríguez-Álvaro Martín, García-Hernández Alfonso Miguel. Continuidad de vínculos, hombres y mujeres en duelo por un ser querido: un análisis secundario. Revista Cuidarte. 2023;14(3):e3039. http://dx.doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.3039
References
Rubin SS, Manevich A, Doron II. The Two-Track Model of Dementia Grief (TTM-DG): The theoretical and clinical significance of the continuing bond in sickness and in death. Death Stud. 2021; 45(10): 755-771. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2019.1688014
Burke LA, Neimeyer RA. Prospective risk factors for complicated grief: A review of the empirical literature. In: Stroebe MS, Schut H, Van der Bout J, Boelen P, editors. Complicated grief: scientific foundations for healthcare professionals. London: Routledge; 2013. p. 145-61.
Alburqueque S, Narciso I, Pereira M. Posttraumatic growth in bereaved parents: a multidimensional model of associated factors. Psychol Trauma. 2018; 10(2): 199-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tra0000305
Hopf D, Eckstein M, Ditzen B, Aguilar-Raab C. Still with me? Assessing the persisting relationship to a deceased loved-one – Validation of the “Continuing Bonds Scale” in a German population. OMEGA- Journal of Death and Dying 2022;1-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228221076622
Wada K, Buote LC, Kawamoto S. Perceptions of ideal grief and continuing bonds: Undergraduate student survey on persistent complex bereavement disorder. Death Stud. 2022; 46(5): 1111-1122. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1795747
García-Hernández AM, Rodríguez-Álvaro M, Brito-Brito PR, Fernández-Gutiérrez DA, Martínez-Alberto CE, Marrero-González CM. Duelo Adaptativo, No Adaptativo y Continuidad de Vínculos. Ene. 2021; 15(1): 1-26. http://ene-enfermeria.org/ojs/index.php/ENE/article/view/1242
Herdman TH, Kamitsuru S, Takáo Lopes C. Nursing diagnoses. Definitions and classification 2021-2023. 12th ed. New York: Thieme; 2021.
Sirrine EH, Salloum A, Boothroyd R. Predictors of continuing bonds among bereaved adolescents. OMEGA. 2018; 76(3): 237-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222817727632
Karydi E. Childhood bereavement: the role of the surviving parent and the continuing bonds with the deceased. Death Stud. 2018; 42(7): 415-425. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2017.1363829
Field NP, Filanosky C. Continuing Bonds, Risk Factors for Complicated Grief, and Adjustment to Bereavement. Death Stud. 2009; 34(1): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180903372269
Scholtes D, Browne M. Internalized and Externalized Continuing Bonds in Bereaved Parents: Their Relationship with Grief Intensity and Personal Growth. Death Stud. 2015; 39(2): 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2014.890680
Stein CH, Petrowski CE, Gonzales SM, Mattei GM, Majcher JH, Froemming MW, et al. A matter of life and death: Understanding continuing bonds and post‐traumatic growth when young adults experience the loss of a close friend. J Child Fam Stud. 2018; 27(3): 725-738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0943-x
Jahn DR, Spencer-Thomas S. A qualitative examination of continuing bonds through spiritual experiences in individuals bereaved by Suicide. Religions. 2018; 9(8): 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9080248
STROBE. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology [Internet] 2023 [cited 2023 Jan. 13]. Available from URL: https://www.strobe-statement.org/
García-Hernández AM, Brito-Brito PR, Rodríguez-Álvaro M, Gutiérrez-Fernández DA, Marrero-González CM, Martínez-Alberto CE, et al. Adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Continuidad de Vínculos (ECV) con el ser querido fallecido. Cultura de los Cuidados. 2021; 25(60): 265-289. https://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/116430/1/CultCuid60_19.pdf
Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
Kline P. An easy guide to factor analysis. New York: Routledge; 1994.
Aron A, Aron EN, Smollan D. Inclusion of the other in the self-scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992; 63(4): 596-612. https://doi.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-3514.63.4.596
Martínez-Esquivel D, Brito-Brito PR, Rodríguez-Álvaro M, García-Hernández AM. “El duelo y la continuidad de vínculos”. 2023. Mendeley Data V1. https://doi.org/10.17632/nf38jrgg4w.1
Lipp NS, O’Brien KM. Bereaved College Students: Social Support, Coping Style, Continuing Bonds, and Social Media Use as Predictors of Complicated Grief and Posttraumatic Growth. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying. 2022; 85(1): 178-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222820941952
Liu TH, Field N. Continuing bonds and dreams following violent loss among Cambodian survivors of the pol pot era. Death Stud. 2022; 46(2): 297-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2019.1699202
Clabburn O, Knighting K, Jack B, O’Brien MR. Continuing bonds with children and bereaved young people: a narrative review. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying. 2021; 83(3): 371-389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222819853195
Black J, Belicki K, Emberley-Ralph J, McCann A. Internalized versus externalized continuing bonds: Relations to grief, trauma, attachment, openness to experience, and posttraumatic growth. Death Stud. 2020; 46(2): 399-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1737274
Keser E, Işıklı S. Investigation of the relationship between continuing bonds and adjustment after the death of a first-degree family member by using the Multidimensional Continuing Bonds Scales. J Clin Psychol. 2022; 78(2): 218-232. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23210
Moreira RJM, Lima JL, Abreu NA, Martins GY, Maia RM, Macedo AR. Nursing care in mental health based on the TIDAL MODEL: an integrative review. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020; 73(2): e20180177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0177
Neimeyer R, Baldwin S, Gillies J. Continuing bonds and reconstructing meaning: mitigating complications in bereavement. Death Stud. 2006; 30(8): 715-738. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180600848322
Kusdemir S, Oudshoorn A, Ndayisenga JP. A critical analysis of the Tidal Model of Mental Health Recovery. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2022; 36: 34-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2021.10.012
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
Altmetrics
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Cuidarte
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal Cuidarte, scientific publication of open access, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Any other form of use such as reproduction, transformation, public communication or distribution, for profit, requires the prior authorization of the University of Santander UDES.
The names and e-mail addresses entered in the Journal Cuidarte will be used exclusively for the purposes stated by this magazine and will not be available for any other purpose or other person.
The articles published in the Journal Cuidarte represent the criteria of their authors and do not necessarily constitute the official opinion of the University of Santander UDES.