Stigma and low vision. An analysis of experiences and feelings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.3974Keywords:
Social Stigma, Stereotyping, Self Concept, Quality of Life, Mental HealthAbstract
Highlights
- There is a lack of awareness about the difference between absolute and partial vision loss, facilitating the consolidation of negative stereotypes about low vision.
- The fragmentation of health services favors the adoption of autonomous adaptation processes to compensate for the lack of access to rehabilitation.
- Consolidating support networks in family, social, work, and medical environments is an effective strategy for managing low vision and the associated stigma.
- Physical adaptations in public places and transportation systems are necessary to promote autonomy. Furthermore, work and academic activities must be reorganized according to the level of visual functioning.
Introduction: Low vision is a sensory impairment that restricts the autonomous execution of activities of daily living, negatively affecting the quality of life and fostering the appearance of stigma. Objective: To explore the experiences and feelings about stigma experienced by people with low vision to provide elements that favor their understanding within the framework of a comprehensive care process. Materials and Methods: A phenomenological study was conducted, employing in-depth interviews with 10 low-vision individuals, selected based on convenience. Results: The reports indicate that the experiences associated with the stigmatization process include a lack of differentiation between individuals who are blind and those with low vision, inadequate signage, and cultural and communicative practices that are based on ocularcentrism. In terms of emotional responses, a lack of positive self-perception is the most significant factor, leading to social withdrawal. Finally, the proposed strategies encompass the formation of support networks, the provision of psychosocial assistance, the adaptation of physical spaces, and the promotion of organizational restructuring in educational institutions and companies. Discussion: The stigma associated with low vision is the result of a set of cultural factors and stereotypes, which can be explained as a phenomenon through the socio-ecological model, providing information to design interventions at the individual, community, organizational, and structural levels. Conclusion: The experiences derived from social interaction, educational processes, and work activity generate feelings that modify the stigmatization process in low-vision individuals. Therefore, studying and planning health interventions from different levels is advisable, considering the gender and life cycle perspective.
How to cite this article: Palencia Flórez Diana Cristina, Oviedo Cáceres María del Pilar. Stigma and low vision. An analysis of experiences and feelings. Revista Cuidarte. 2024;15(3):e3974. https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.3974
References
Suarez Escudero JC. Discapacidad visual y ceguera en el adulto : Revisión de tema. Medicina UPB. 2011;30(2):170–80. https://revistas.upb.edu.co/index.php/medicina/article/view/1822
Steinmetz JD, Bourne RR, Briant PS, Flaxman SR, Taylor HR, Jonas JB, et al. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: The Right to Sight: An analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(2):e144–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7
Martolini C, Cappagli G, Luparia A, Signorini S, Gori M. The Impact of Vision Loss on Allocentric Spatial Coding. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:565. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00565
Miyauchi H. A systematic review on inclusive education of students with visual impairment. Educ Sci (Basel). 2020;10(11):1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110346
Marques AP, Macedo AF, Lima Ramos P, Moreno LH, Butt T, Rubin G, et al. Productivity Losses and Their Explanatory Factors Amongst People with Impaired Vision. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2019;26(6):378–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2019.1632904
Kim HM, Son SM. Impacts of Daily Life and Job Satisfaction on Social Participation of Persons with Visual Impairment. Occup Ther Int. 2023;(1):6475756. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6475756
Mengste YL, Belete GT, Eticha BL, Zeleke TC. Self-Reported Fall-Related Injury and Its Associated Factors among Adults with Visual Impairment Attending St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2023 Mar 1;33(2):263–72. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v33i2.11
Parravano M, Petri D, Maurutto E, Lucenteforte E, Menchini F, Lanzetta P, et al. Association Between Visual Impairment and Depression in Patients Attending Eye Clinics. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139(7):753-761. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.1557
Ehrlich JR, Ramke J, Macleod D, Burn H, Lee CN, Zhang JH, et al. Association between vision impairment and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(4):e418–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30549-0
Cisneros Sosa A. Interaccionismo simbólico, un pragmatismo acrítico en el terreno de los movimientos sociales. Sociológica. 1999;14(41):104–26. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3050/305026706001.pdf
Abreu C. Análisis estructuralista de la teoría del etiquetamiento. Diánoia. 2019;64(82):31-59.https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704913e.2019.82.1634
Pérez-Garín D, Recio P, Molero F. Consequences of perceived personal and group discrimination against people with hearing and visual impairments. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(17):9004. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179064
Organización de las Naciones Unidas. Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad. 2018. Consulta: Septiembre 06, 2024. Disponible en: https://feji.us/okuuhf
Stangl AL, Earnshaw VA, Logie CH, Van Brakel W, Simbayi LC, Barré I, et al. The Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework: A global, crosscutting framework to inform research, intervention development, and policy on health-related stigmas. BMC Med. 2019;17:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1271-3
Ministerio del trabajo, Ministerio de Salud y Protección social, Ministerio de hacienda y crédito público. Ley_1618_de_2013. República de Colombia, 1618 Colombia; Feb 27, 2013 p. 1–23. Consulta: Septiembre 29, 2023. Disponible en: https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma_pdf.php?i=52081
Oviedo-Cáceres MdelP, Arias-Pineda KN, Palencia-Flórez DC. Low vision rehabilitation: an incipient issue. Revista Cuidarte. 2023;14(2). https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.2665
Mendieta-Izquierdo G, Ramírez Rodríguez JC, Fuerte JA. La fenomenología desde la perspectiva hermenéutica de Heidegger: una propuesta metodológica para la salud pública. Revista Facultad Nacional Salud Pública.> 2015;33(3):435–43. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v33n3a14
Corrigan PW, Morris SB, Michaels PJ, Rafacz JD, Rüsch N. Challenging the Public Stigma of Mental Illness: A Meta-Analysis of Outcome Studies. Psychiatric Services. 2012;63(10):963-973. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201100529
Pinel EC. Stigma consciousness: The psychological legacy of social stereotypes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;76(1):114–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.114
Vives Varela T, Hamui Sutton L. Coding and categorization in grounded theory a method for qualitative data analysis. Investigacion en Educacion Medica. 2021;10(40):97–104. https://doi.org/10.22201/fm.20075057e.2021.40.21367
Palencia Flórez DC, Oviedo Cáceres MdelP. “Estigma y baja visión.” 2024. Mendeley Data, V2. https://doi.org/10.17632/6kvv5yvr9g.1
Bulk LY, Smith A, Nimmon L, Jarus T. A closer look at opportunities for blind adults: Impacts of stigmatization and ocularcentrism. British Journal of Visual Impairment. 2020;38(3):270–83https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619620911424
Tyler I. Resituating Erving Goffman: From stigma power to black power. Sociological Review.2018;66(4):744–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118777450
Perrault MA, Lauer G, Voss S, Seitz B, Käsmann-Kellner B. Visual Impairment and Low Vision Aids—A Comparison between Children and Adults. J Pers Med. 2023;13(11):1608. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13111608
Dos Santos ADP, Ferrari ALM, Medola FO, Sandnes FE. Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022;17(2):152–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1768308
Valencia S, Steidl M, Rivera ML, Bennett CL, Bigham JP, Admoni H. Nonverbal Communication through Expressive Objects. Commun ACM. 2024;67(1):123–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610939
Kavanagh D. Ocularcentrism and its Others: A Framework for Metatheoretical Analysis. Organization Studies. 2004;25(3):445-464https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604040672
Fraser S, Beeman I, Southall K, Wittich W. Stereotyping as a barrier to the social participation of older adults with low vision: A qualitative focus group study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(9):e029940. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029940
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
Funding data
-
University of Santo Tomas
Grant numbers MC-2023-UP059
Altmetrics
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Cuidarte
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal Cuidarte, scientific publication of open access, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Any other form of use such as reproduction, transformation, public communication or distribution, for profit, requires the prior authorization of the University of Santander UDES.
The names and e-mail addresses entered in the Journal Cuidarte will be used exclusively for the purposes stated by this magazine and will not be available for any other purpose or other person.
The articles published in the Journal Cuidarte represent the criteria of their authors and do not necessarily constitute the official opinion of the University of Santander UDES.